2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0886-7798(03)00068-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different tunnel face advance excavation on the settlement by FEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Basic parameters affecting the ground deformations are ground conditions, technical/environmental parameters, and tunneling or construction methods (O'Reilly and New 1982;Arioglu 1992;Karakus and Fowell 2003;Tan and Ranjit 2003;Minguez et al 2005;Ellis 2005;Suwansawat and Einstein 2006). Detailed site investigations should be performed to determine physical and mechanical properties of the ground, existence of underground water, and deformation characteristics, especially stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic parameters affecting the ground deformations are ground conditions, technical/environmental parameters, and tunneling or construction methods (O'Reilly and New 1982;Arioglu 1992;Karakus and Fowell 2003;Tan and Ranjit 2003;Minguez et al 2005;Ellis 2005;Suwansawat and Einstein 2006). Detailed site investigations should be performed to determine physical and mechanical properties of the ground, existence of underground water, and deformation characteristics, especially stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the range of ratio E/E is 1.35-2.37, G /E is 0.23-0.44 [14][15][16][17], and / is hypothetically assumed varying 0.75-1.5. The values of E and adopted in Table I are 50 MPa [18] and 0.3 [19]. Therefore, a parametric study by three examples is illustrated as follows:…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Effect of load inclination, , on the normalized surface displacements when = 30 • : From Figure 34, it is shown that the displacements at any depth, the surface displacements, and the average displacements in a given layer can utilize Equations (1)-(3) with the combinations of Equations (14)- (19), (21)-(26), and (29)-(34). In this example, the surface displacements, u x , u y , and u z , are computed by using the properties of isotropic/cross-anisotropic soils (Soil 1/Soils 2-7, Table I), and assuming = 30 • , the width (B) and the length (L) of a rectangle are, respectively, 4 and 6 m. Figure 35 shows the effect of load inclination, , from 0 to 360 • , on the normalized surface displacements, u x /q (Figure 35(a)), u y /q (Figure 35(b)), and u z /q (Figure 35(c)), for Soils 1-7.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their elastic properties are listed in Table III. In Table III, E and are, respectively, 50 MPa [27] and 0.3 [28]. A Mathematica R program based on Equations (4)-(6) (for a point load), Equations (8), (10) and (11) (for a uniform skin friction), and Equations (14)-(16) (for a linear variation of skin friction), is written to compute the vertical stresses.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%