2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7nj00984d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different proton donor and acceptor groups on excited-state intramolecular proton transfers of amino-type and hydroxy-type hydrogen-bonding molecules: theoretical insights

Abstract: The effect of proton donors (NH and OH) on ESIPT was investigated using DFT and TD-DFT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electronic cloud surrounding (N―H) proton donor at the LUMO level shrinks to a larger extent in comparison to that observed at the HOMO level, and such changes were not observed for the proton acceptor moiety (C═O) . Such observed changes over electronic cloud support good interactions between proton donor and acceptor moieties heading toward a better proton translocation at the S1 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Electronic cloud surrounding (N―H) proton donor at the LUMO level shrinks to a larger extent in comparison to that observed at the HOMO level, and such changes were not observed for the proton acceptor moiety (C═O) . Such observed changes over electronic cloud support good interactions between proton donor and acceptor moieties heading toward a better proton translocation at the S1 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…BTN possesses a dihedral angle of 39.9° at its ground state and 36.8° at its excited state between the planes connecting the bithiophene unit and the pyridine ring on both the arms. The planar structure might well support the proton transfer process in a system in comparison with a sterically hindered structure . The dihedral angle between the planes possessing N―H and ―C═O is 1.7° for BTN at S0 and increases to a value of 2.3° at S1, whereas BTO exhibits 0.0° at S0 and increases to a value of 0.8° at S1 with BTS maintaining 0.0° for both S0 and S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous attempts have been made to design ESIPT‐based molecular units conjugated with various additional receptor sites such as 2‐(2′‐hydroxyphenyl)benzoxazole, 2‐(2′‐hydroxyphenyl)imidazole, 2‐phenyl‐3‐hydroxy‐4(1H)‐quinolone, 3‐hydroxyflavone, hydroxybenzo[ h ]quinoline, and 2‐(2′‐hydroxyphenyl)imidazo[1,2‐ a ]pyridines along with unusual naphthylphenols and phenylnaphthols for sensing and biological studies. Such units showed emission in organic/mixed aqueous media, which was triggered through the ESIPT process.…”
Section: Designing Of Probes and Its Strategic Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant increase in both the acidic and basic property of proton donor as well as the acceptor groups in the excited state leads the ESIPT process to occur in ultrafast time scale . Typical ESIPT time constants (τ ESIPT ) ranging from few tens of femtoseconds to few picoseconds are reported in the literature for different systems .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%