2014
DOI: 10.2113/gsjfr.44.4.416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Different Potential Food Sources on Upper-Bathyal Benthic Foraminifera: An Experiment With Propagules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A propagule experiment by Duffield et al . () showed that the addition of different types of food influenced the resulting foraminiferal assemblage, providing certain species with a better ability to compete with those species that were able to sustain themselves from algae that were present in the sediment or grew during the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A propagule experiment by Duffield et al . () showed that the addition of different types of food influenced the resulting foraminiferal assemblage, providing certain species with a better ability to compete with those species that were able to sustain themselves from algae that were present in the sediment or grew during the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional food was used in a study by Duffield et al . () but they also found that most foraminifera do grow in the absence of additional food. The algae grown within the sediment during the course of the present experiment provided nutrition for those species that rely on external food sources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bathysiphon species are well-known for occupying deposit-feeding niches (Landing et al, 2012). Because they mainly feed on detritus and bacteria (Duffield et al, 2014) this may give them the ability to thrive in low organic content conditions such as those observed near the WHs. Bathysiphon tests are made of agglutinated material (micaceous scales or quartz grains) instead of calcium carbonate (Cole and Valentine, 2006;Sen Gupta, 2002).…”
Section: Foraminiferal Indicators Of Environmental Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field and laboratory studies showed that deep-sea foraminifera are adapted to limited or no supply of food material for long periods, meaning starvation (Linke 1992, Graf & Linke 1992. The abundance of specimens not fed with additional food also increased, suggesting that most species were feeding on microbes or detritus available in the sediment (Duffield et al 2014). The seawater provided to the specimens in the present study contained microbes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…But such a possibility is ruled out in the present experiment as all the specimens were fed the same type of food. Additionally, the chance of any adverse impact of a single diatom diet on C. plana is also unlikely, as the monospecific diatom cultures grown in the laboratory were the most favourable food for foraminifera (Duffield et al 2014). The response of C. plana to food is similar to another benthic foraminifer Marginopora kudakajimensis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%