2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.109949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different magnetic fields on the freezing parameters of cherry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that the SMF decreased the nucleation temperature and average ice crystal size, while OMF just increased phase change time and had no significant effect on the other freezing parameters. Tang, Zhang [12] reported that 10 mT and 1.26 mT were the optimum strength of the magnetic field for SMF and OMF, respectively. They found that the phase change time was decreased under SMF, while it was increased with OMF.…”
Section: Magnetically Disturbed Freezingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results showed that the SMF decreased the nucleation temperature and average ice crystal size, while OMF just increased phase change time and had no significant effect on the other freezing parameters. Tang, Zhang [12] reported that 10 mT and 1.26 mT were the optimum strength of the magnetic field for SMF and OMF, respectively. They found that the phase change time was decreased under SMF, while it was increased with OMF.…”
Section: Magnetically Disturbed Freezingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, employing novel freezing techniques (rapid freezing methods) for reducing damages of freezing is essential [8]. Controlling of ice crystals nucleation and subsequent ice crystals growth has been evaluated by ultrasound-assisted freezing (UAF) [10], electrically disturbed freezing (EF) [11], magnetically disturbed freezing (MF) [12], microwave-assisted freezing (MAF) [13], radiofrequency freezing (RF) [14], high-pressure freezing (HPF) [15], osmo-dehydro-freezing (ODF) [16], ice nucleating proteins (INPs) [17], antifreeze proteins (AFPs) and antifreeze glycoproteins (AFGPs) [18]. Compared with conventional freezing methods, several benefits are reported by employing novel freezing approaches, including maintaining nutritional value [5,12], better flavor and taste [19], retarding the browning index [20], enzymes inactivations [21], reducing the drip loss [13,22,23], keeping water holding capacity [24,25], retaining better texture [13,26], more stable colour parameters [13,15,22], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tu et al (2015) pointed out that ultrasound freezing can increase the freezing rate and hardness, and reduce drip loss to an extent which is obvious (Tu et al, 2015). Tang et al (2020b) found that the lowest drip loss for cherries under a permanent magnetic field and an alternating magnetic field were 4.79% and 4.64% (Tang et al, 2020b). Otero et al (2000) found that high-pressure-translocation freezing can prevent cell mass loss due to icing or the presence of a large number of ice crystals (Otero et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the control group, the average ice crystal area of PMF and AMF is reduced by 67% and 78%, respectively. The freezing effect is significant, but it does not increase with increasing magnetic field strength (Tang et al., 2020). In Zhou Zipeng's experimental study, pork was used as the research object, and a DC magnetic field was applied during the freezing process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%