2019
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-19-471-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different land use and land cover data on the landslide susceptibility zonation of road networks

Abstract: Abstract. This work evaluates the influence of land use and land cover (LUC) data with different properties on the landslide susceptibility zonation of the road network in the Zêzere watershed (Portugal). The information value method was used to assess the landslide susceptibility using two models: one including detailed LUC data (the Portuguese Land Cover Map – COS) and the other including more generalized LUC data (the CORINE Land Cover – CLC). A set of fixed independent layers was considered as landslide pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Sen is also considered the true positive rate, and the value (1 − Spe) is the rate of false positives (Melchiorre et al, 2008). Generally, high sensitivity indicates a high number of correct predictions, whereas high specificity (low 1 − Spe difference) indicates a low number of false positives (Mohammady et al, 2012). Hence, the Sen of the model is plotted against 1 − Spe to obtain the ROC curve, and in most cases the area under the curve (AUC) is utilized to evaluate the prediction ability of models.…”
Section: Receiver Operating Characteristic (Roc) Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sen is also considered the true positive rate, and the value (1 − Spe) is the rate of false positives (Melchiorre et al, 2008). Generally, high sensitivity indicates a high number of correct predictions, whereas high specificity (low 1 − Spe difference) indicates a low number of false positives (Mohammady et al, 2012). Hence, the Sen of the model is plotted against 1 − Spe to obtain the ROC curve, and in most cases the area under the curve (AUC) is utilized to evaluate the prediction ability of models.…”
Section: Receiver Operating Characteristic (Roc) Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CLC project largely fulfills the expectations of researchers and other users [6], having two main advantages: it provides a seamless geometry usable for macro-regional studies and an internal classification of the land use/cover categories that allows time traceability of changes, for a reasonable period . The facility of tracking the changes in the use of the land has allowed a multitude of applications and correlations between CLC datasets and different parameters [7][8][9]. There is an intense use of the CLC datasets for local or regional studies; however, the intermediate scales are systematically neglected by other researches [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies have frequently pointed to the anthropogenic triggering factors such as distance to roads [51,53,78,105,130], road density [76,105,135], land-use/land-cover types [42,47,49,58,78,106], and land-use changes [3,136,137] for the mapping of landslide susceptibility.…”
Section: The Importance Of Conditioning Factors For Mapping Landslidementioning
confidence: 99%