2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Different Head Positioning Methods on Facial Soft Tissue Analysis Using Stereophotogrammetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NHP has been shown to be reproducible 8 . The self‐balance plus mirror method described by Amuk et al, 9 places the patient's head in a repeatable, accurate position capturing the correct relationship of the maxillary teeth to the cranio‐facial horizontal axis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NHP has been shown to be reproducible 8 . The self‐balance plus mirror method described by Amuk et al, 9 places the patient's head in a repeatable, accurate position capturing the correct relationship of the maxillary teeth to the cranio‐facial horizontal axis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] Moreover, the sitting and standing NHP have been used in soft tissue analysis. [8][9][10] The TrH plane based on the NHP is thought to be a good performance reference plane in the lateral photograph or cephalometry analysis (pitch axis). 11,12 Yet, for patients with torticollis or muscle disorders or imbalances, the NHP might be misleading especially in the frontal analysis (roll axis).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural head position (NHP), that is, an upright position of the head, has been broadly used as a reference plane in ophthalmology, orthodontics, orthognathic surgery, etc 5–7. Moreover, the sitting and standing NHP have been used in soft tissue analysis 8–10. The TrH plane based on the NHP is thought to be a good performance reference plane in the lateral photograph or cephalometry analysis (pitch axis) 11,12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%