2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different diluents, cryoprotective agents, and freezing rates on sperm cryopreservation in Epinephelus akaara

Abstract: We investigated various factors, including cryoprotective agents (CPAs), diluents, and freezing rates, to develop an optimal cryopreservation protocol for Epinephelus akaara sperm. In experiments using 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol, and methanol with various diluents, 10% DMSO and 300 mM glucose yielded the highest post-thaw sperm motility. The combination of 10% glycerol and 300 mM sucrose yielded significantly higher post-thaw sperm motility than did combinations using other diluents. Glycerol and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 200 studies on the cryopreservation of fish milt have been developed globally (Torres et al 2016). However, post‐thaw sperm viability and quality are highly dependent on numerous biological and methodological factors, such as the origin and nutritional status of the fish (Cabrita et al 2014), type of cryoprotective agents (CPAs: permeating and nonpermeating) and their concentration (Judycka et al 2018), freezing/thawing rate, equilibrium time (Ahn et al 2018), packaging system, membrane stabilizers, and antioxidants (Fig ueroa et al 2017, 2018). In addition, the methodologies need to be adapted for each species (Pan et al 2008; Martínez‐Páramo et al 2017; Yang et al 2017; Bernáth et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 200 studies on the cryopreservation of fish milt have been developed globally (Torres et al 2016). However, post‐thaw sperm viability and quality are highly dependent on numerous biological and methodological factors, such as the origin and nutritional status of the fish (Cabrita et al 2014), type of cryoprotective agents (CPAs: permeating and nonpermeating) and their concentration (Judycka et al 2018), freezing/thawing rate, equilibrium time (Ahn et al 2018), packaging system, membrane stabilizers, and antioxidants (Fig ueroa et al 2017, 2018). In addition, the methodologies need to be adapted for each species (Pan et al 2008; Martínez‐Páramo et al 2017; Yang et al 2017; Bernáth et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced capacity on controlling freezing temperatures and freezing rates in a dry shipper would generate a wide range of applications in semen cryopreservation of other freshwater and marine fish species that require different optimal freezing rates ranging from 5 to 93°C/min (He & Woods, ; Hu, Yang, & Tiersch, ; Kang et al, ; Liu et al, ; Magnotti et al, ; Torres, Hu, & Tiersch, ; Velasco‐Santamaría et al, ). A wide range of optimal freezing rates for semen cryopreservation of fish is possibly explained by unique characteristics of spermatozoa among species, concentrations of cryoprotectants, equilibration time, final temperatures prior to plunging in liquid nitrogen and their associated interactions (Ahn, Park, & Lim, ; Koh et al, ; Routray et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, because the types and concentrations of cryoprotective agents (CPAs) and diluents can cause remarkable differences in cryopreservation results, basic information on cryopreservation of fish sperm is necessary (Lee et al, 2021). CPAs play a role in alleviating and regulating conditions unfavorable to cell survival, such as concentration of intracellular electrolytes, increase in osmolality, and formation of ice crystals inside and outside cells, which are generated during the freezing of cells (Ahn et al, 2018). The diluted solution actively helps in the survival of the sperm after freezing and thawing and prevents the sperm from being activated by osmotic shock, with osmolality similar to that of the semen used (Kho & Kang, 2003;Zidni et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%