2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2016.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different chromosome representations in developing genetic algorithms to solve DFJS scheduling problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using GA, Lu et al [19] also proposed an incomplete decoding representation with only a job sequence, and all the three sub-problems were decided in the decoding process by heuristic rules. Then, Wu et al [15] proposed another incomplete encoding representation that only took operations sequence into consideration. Moreover, a novel GA with this encoding scheme was designed [15].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By using GA, Lu et al [19] also proposed an incomplete decoding representation with only a job sequence, and all the three sub-problems were decided in the decoding process by heuristic rules. Then, Wu et al [15] proposed another incomplete encoding representation that only took operations sequence into consideration. Moreover, a novel GA with this encoding scheme was designed [15].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, Wu et al [15] proposed another incomplete encoding representation that only took operations sequence into consideration. Moreover, a novel GA with this encoding scheme was designed [15]. Except for GA, Ziaee [20] designed an efficient heuristic; Marzouki et al [21] proposed a chemical reaction optimization (CRO) algorithm, and Wu et al [22] proposed an improved differential evolution (IDE) algorithm for solving DFJSP with minimizing makespan or earliness/tardiness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(i) Dual-resource constrained FJSSP, for example, [52,162] (ii) Sequence dependent setup times, for example, [88,207] (iii) Distributed and flexible JSSP, for example, [79,99] (iv) Just-In-Time dynamic scheduling, for example, [80,83] (v) Overlapping in operations, for example, [73,98] (vi) Random machine breakdowns, for example, [91,184] (vii) Dynamic FJSSP, for example, [94,96].…”
Section: Software Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%