2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2019.105714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different attention tasks on concurrent speech in adults who stutter and fluent controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the mean percentage of stuttering in L2 under divided attention was still higher than the mean percentage of stuttering under full attention In L1. This proposition is furthermore corroborated by the outcome of studies that did employ a more demanding secondary task, such as a spatial working memory task (Eichorn et al, 2016;2019) or a dot-pattern tracking task (Arends et al, 1988).…”
Section: The Effect Of a Non-linguistic Secondary Taskmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the mean percentage of stuttering in L2 under divided attention was still higher than the mean percentage of stuttering under full attention In L1. This proposition is furthermore corroborated by the outcome of studies that did employ a more demanding secondary task, such as a spatial working memory task (Eichorn et al, 2016;2019) or a dot-pattern tracking task (Arends et al, 1988).…”
Section: The Effect Of a Non-linguistic Secondary Taskmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Whereas some studies demonstrate a decrease in stuttering frequency (e.g. Arends, Povel, & Kolk, 1988;Eichorn, Marton, Schwartz, Melara, & Pirutinsky, 2016;Eichorn, Pirutinsky, & Marton, 2019;Vasiç & Wijnen, 2005), others have found an increase (e.g. Bosshardt, 2002;Caruso, Chodzko-Zajko, Bidinger, & Sommers, 1994).…”
Section: S Tuttering and Attentional Demandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various experimental paradigms have been used to measure WM abilities of PWS, such as rhyme judgment, letter recall, and phoneme monitoring (Bosshardt et al, 2002;Jones et al, 2012;Sasisekaran & Basu, 2017). In particular, nonword repetition task and dual task have been repeatedly employed in previous studies (Anderson & Wagovich, 2010;Anderson et al, 2006;Arends et al, 1988;Bosshardt, 1993Bosshardt, , 1999Bosshardt, , 2002Bosshardt et al, 2002;Byrd et al, 2015Byrd et al, , 2012Eichorn et al, 2016Eichorn et al, , 2019Hakim & Bernstein Ratner, 2004;Kamhi & McOsker, 1982;Metten et al, 2011;Sasisekaran, 2013;Vasić & Wijnen, 2005).…”
Section: Wm In Pwsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the fluency performance, a reduction of disfluencies during dual-task conditions is reported (Arends et al, 1988;Bosshardt, 1999;Eichorn et al, 2016;Vasić & Wijnen, 2005), even with no significant group differences in the secondary-task performance between PWS and people who do not stutter (PWNS) in some of the dual-task paradigms (Bosshardt, 1999;Bosshardt et al, 2002;Eichorn et al, 2016Eichorn et al, , 2019. In these studies, while the primary task (speech) is in the verbal domain, the secondary tasks are in a different domain, such as spatial and mental arithmetic tasks.…”
Section: Wm In Pwsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation