1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.1988.tb00875.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Different Aging Procedures on the Palatability of Beef

Abstract: Ten pairs of beef strip loins were obtained 48 h postmortem from ten good grade beef carcasses. Three steaks (2.5 cm thick) were cut from the loin end of each strip loin and the remaining portion retained as the subprimal. Steaks and subprimals were aged for 7 days at 2 "C in the following treatments: polyvinyl chloride ovenvrapped steaks (PVC-ST), vacuum packaged steaks (VP-ST), vacuum packaged subprimals (VP-SP), and subprimals heM in air (Air-SP). Afrer aging of the subprimal, 3 additional steaks were cut f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stepwise ageing involving the in-bag dry-ageing of lean bull beef for 7 d followed by 14 d of wet-ageing (T2) significantly (p < 0.0001) reduced % weight loss of the dryaged meat compared to the control (T1, in-bag dry-aged straight for 21 d). In this study, stepwise ageing had no effect on the pH, proximate content, and instrumental colour of fresh in-bag dry-aged beef (p > 0.05, Table 1) as was previously reported [29][30][31][32]. e water-holding capacity (measured as drip and cook losses) of fresh in-bag dry-aged lean beef (21 d, T1 and T2) were not affected by the stepwise ageing regimes, as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Effect Of Stepwise Ageing On the Physicochemicalsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Stepwise ageing involving the in-bag dry-ageing of lean bull beef for 7 d followed by 14 d of wet-ageing (T2) significantly (p < 0.0001) reduced % weight loss of the dryaged meat compared to the control (T1, in-bag dry-aged straight for 21 d). In this study, stepwise ageing had no effect on the pH, proximate content, and instrumental colour of fresh in-bag dry-aged beef (p > 0.05, Table 1) as was previously reported [29][30][31][32]. e water-holding capacity (measured as drip and cook losses) of fresh in-bag dry-aged lean beef (21 d, T1 and T2) were not affected by the stepwise ageing regimes, as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Effect Of Stepwise Ageing On the Physicochemicalsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Dry aging literature has mainly reported the optimum temperature is between 0° and 4 °C (32–39.2 °F) because storage temperature for dry aged beef should not differ from those for wet-aged beef products [ 1 , 4 6 , 8 , 12 , 16 , 17 , 25 ]. Aging temperature is critical to dry aging because if the temperature of storage is elevated, the enzymatic processes involved in aging will work quite well and improve palatability.…”
Section: Dry Aging Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the companion ribs and loins that were wet-aged for 21 d showed no shrinkage and had trim losses ranging from 0.55% to 1.17%. Oreskovich et al . (1988) reported that at the end of 7 d of aging, the striploins that were dry-aged exhibited 4.62% shrinkage, which was significantly higher in comparison to the steaks packaged in polyvinyl chloride films (2.93%) and vacuum-packed steaks (0.55%).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Yield And Quality Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%