2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-6226(02)00009-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dietary undegradable crude protein level on total non-structural carbohydrate (TNC) digestibility, and milk yield and composition of dairy cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in the apparent digestibility of CP in the diets L-40 and H-40 as compared to diets L-30 and H-30, in both species, could result from the higher level of undegraded protein used in these diets. These figures indicate that the post-ruminal digestibility of the undegraded protein, both in buffalo and sheep, is higher than that from protein of microbial origin as had already been indicated by Bruckental et al (2002) for the dairy cow; however these latter Authors, with a different species and under different physiological condition, obtained a digestibility of the microbial protein inferior to ours. Moving on to examine the nitrogen balance, for the buffalo species the difference in digestible protein between the average of the diets H-40 + L-40 vs. H-30 + L-30 is 5.00 g/day, equal to a saving of 50.14 g/head/day of dry matter; while for the sheep, using the same procedure, one obtains a difference of 1.65 g/day of digestible protein, equal to a saving of 12.50 g/head/day of dry matter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 44%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase in the apparent digestibility of CP in the diets L-40 and H-40 as compared to diets L-30 and H-30, in both species, could result from the higher level of undegraded protein used in these diets. These figures indicate that the post-ruminal digestibility of the undegraded protein, both in buffalo and sheep, is higher than that from protein of microbial origin as had already been indicated by Bruckental et al (2002) for the dairy cow; however these latter Authors, with a different species and under different physiological condition, obtained a digestibility of the microbial protein inferior to ours. Moving on to examine the nitrogen balance, for the buffalo species the difference in digestible protein between the average of the diets H-40 + L-40 vs. H-30 + L-30 is 5.00 g/day, equal to a saving of 50.14 g/head/day of dry matter; while for the sheep, using the same procedure, one obtains a difference of 1.65 g/day of digestible protein, equal to a saving of 12.50 g/head/day of dry matter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 44%
“…The digestibility of non-structural carbohydrates, in the buffalo, presents a significant difference between the two diets at the high and low energy level (90.59%, 89.46% vs. 85.95%, 85.81%, P b 0.05) whilst in sheep there is a significant difference only between diet L-40 and the diets H-30 and H-40 (87.62% vs. 83.16%, 83.77%, P b 0.05). For sheep there is a 1.46% increase in the digestibility of the NSC between the diets L-40 and L-30; Bruckental et al (2002) in lactating cow using diets with 41% and 46% UDP found, with respect to the diet with 36% UDP, an increase in digestibility of the total non-structural carbohydrates (TNC) of 2.0% and 2.4%. Therefore while the presence in the diet of the buffalo of 30% or 40% of UDP does not appear to alter the digestibility of non-structural carbohydrates, on the contrary in sheep there is a positive effect with the diet L-40 with 41% of UDP, and also to a more limited degree with the diet H-40 (+ 0.61%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the rumen-undegradable protein and non-structural carbohydrate intakes could also affect nutrient digestibility. Bruckental et al (2002) found that the digestibility of CP and non-structural carbohydrate increased when the proportion of undegradable protein was increased. Table 4 shows the result of rumen fermentation efficiency influenced by Hipro-feed formulated in concentrate mixture in lactating dairy cows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, this suggests a negative effect on ruminal starch degradability when removing ruminal N provided by the SS supplement, although the basal diet was providing substantial soluble N from silage. In contrast, higher total tract digestibility of total non-structural carbohydrate was observed when dietary undegradable CP was increased (Bruckental et al 2002) or following abomasal infusion of casein (Richards et al 2002). Apparent digestibility of NDF tended to be lower (P 00.07) and was numerically lower for ADF for GC than for CC supplemented diets (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%