2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dietary probiotics on beef cattle performance and stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of DMI observed in this experiment is aligned with the level expected for zebu cattle confined under tropical conditions (AZEVÊDO et al, 2016). The lack of effect on intake in response to probiotic supplementation was also observed by other authors (GHORBANI et al, 2002;KEYSER et al, 2007;KELSEY & COLPOYS, 2018) Weights and daily average gain in each phase and total are presented in Table 2. No statistical differences were observed for the effect of treatments on the weights performed over the experimental period.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The level of DMI observed in this experiment is aligned with the level expected for zebu cattle confined under tropical conditions (AZEVÊDO et al, 2016). The lack of effect on intake in response to probiotic supplementation was also observed by other authors (GHORBANI et al, 2002;KEYSER et al, 2007;KELSEY & COLPOYS, 2018) Weights and daily average gain in each phase and total are presented in Table 2. No statistical differences were observed for the effect of treatments on the weights performed over the experimental period.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It is observed that the use of TCP improved the feed conversion of feed into product by 12.6%. Kelsey & Colpoys (2018) used a probiotic containing strains of Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus plantarum and found that weaned calves receiving dietary probiotics had greater ADG and feed efficiency compared with those that did not receive probiotics. Improved performance may be partially explained by the probiotics benefits of increasing feed digestibility, preventing excess of lactate production and improving ruminal fermentation (SEO et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been great concern about the use of antibiotics which may result in antibiotic resistant pathogens, posing a potential risk of exposure for humans and calves [3]. The use of antibiotic in the feed of livestock was banned in European Union from 2006 and in China from July 1, 2020.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D a R T I C L Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A r t i c l e 2) Standard error of the mean; 3) ADG: Average daily gain = weight gain ÷ number of days on feed; 4) TDMI: total dry matter intake of milk replacer and starter feed, g/d; 5) Feed efficiency: g ADG/g TDMI;…”
Section: A C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These probiotics can regulate the balance of gut microbes, promote the growth and productivity of animals and improve host resistance to diseases [ 3 ]. To this end, they have been extensively used in dairy cattle [ 4 ], beef cattle [ 5 ], pigs [ 6 ], hens [ 7 ] and rabbits [ 8 ]. Postbiotics are defined as soluble products or metabolites secreted by probiotics that have physiological benefits to the host [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%