2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4488(00)00131-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dietary level of Leucaena leucocephala on performance of Angora and Spanish doelings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
2
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
7
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Multipurpose trees were also complained of anti nutritional factors (Reed et al, 1990;Melaku et al, 2004), which could significantly limit their utilization. These results are also close to the findings of Yami et al (2000) who reported that the inclusion of varying levels L. leucocephala leaves in the diets had significantly (P < 0.05) affected body weight gain.…”
Section: Live Weight Gain and Feed Conversion Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Multipurpose trees were also complained of anti nutritional factors (Reed et al, 1990;Melaku et al, 2004), which could significantly limit their utilization. These results are also close to the findings of Yami et al (2000) who reported that the inclusion of varying levels L. leucocephala leaves in the diets had significantly (P < 0.05) affected body weight gain.…”
Section: Live Weight Gain and Feed Conversion Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast with Gupta et al (1988), who reported that the reduction in intake of buffaloes has been related to an increased proportion of leucaena in the diet. However, previous studies suggested that the improved intakes were not as high as the intakes of ruminants fed diets containing 34% (Haque et al 2008) and 45% (Yami et al 2000) of leucaena. The digestibility of nutrients being the highest in SB and MB fed diets containing 25% and 50% of leucaena, respectively.…”
Section: Intakes Digestion and N Balancementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Many of the procedures have been described by Yami et al (1999). On d 7 after Leucaena introduction to the diet, a 15 x 15 cm area on the right mid-side was clipped to skin level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were analyzed using General Linear Models procedures of SAS (1990). First, subsequent treatments of Yami et al (1999) did not influence responses in this experiment and, therefore, were not considered. Data were analyzed by breed as a split-plot with a model containing shedding status (main plot), time after initial Leucaena consumption (subplot), and their interaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%