1977
DOI: 10.1021/jf60210a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dietary feeding of organocadmium to cattle and sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers13, 14 have not observed any effect on pig growth rates of Cd concentrations in pig feed up to 50 mg kg −1 feed. However, Cousins et al 15 found that the growth rate of pigs declined linearly to zero as dietary Cd concentration increased to 1.4 g kg −1 , and Wright et al 16 found reduced food conversion efficiency in cattle and sheep consuming food with added Cd. The variation in results may be due to different trace‐element deficiencies being triggered by high Cd intakes in some studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers13, 14 have not observed any effect on pig growth rates of Cd concentrations in pig feed up to 50 mg kg −1 feed. However, Cousins et al 15 found that the growth rate of pigs declined linearly to zero as dietary Cd concentration increased to 1.4 g kg −1 , and Wright et al 16 found reduced food conversion efficiency in cattle and sheep consuming food with added Cd. The variation in results may be due to different trace‐element deficiencies being triggered by high Cd intakes in some studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in hair have been detected in animals exposed to dust from lead ore trucks and smelter emissions. Wright et al (1977) found a good correlation between cadmium in cattle hair and cadmium (as cadminate) in feed for the range of to 500 ppm.…”
Section: Elevated Levels Of Cadmiummentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Cadmium concentrations in cattle urine are also of limited diagnositc use. The narrow range between background values (<0.15 ppm) and the only toxic concentration reported in the reviewed literature (0.7 ppm, Wright et al 1977) (Table 10) suggests urine may not be a reliable indicator of cadmium toxicity. Toxic hazard levels selected for cadmium levels in cattle kidneys and liver are 44 ppm and 25 ppm respectively.…”
Section: Toxic Cadmium Hazard Levels For Cattlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations