2017
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dietary energy allowance and decline in dry matter intake during the dry period on responses to glucose and insulin in transition dairy cows

Abstract: We assessed whether high energy intake during the early dry period [144% of metabolizable energy (ME) requirements/d] followed by a gradual restriction of energy intake in the close-up dry period (119% of ME/d; HEI) impaired whole-body insulin sensitivity compared with a controlled energy intake (100% of ME/d; CEI) throughout the 6-wk dry period. Multiparous Ayrshire dairy cows (n = 16) were blocked by body weight, body condition score, and expected date of parturition and were used in a randomized complete bl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
24
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
14
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing dry matter intake (kg/day) at three days of gestation evaluated, we observed an increase of approximately 15.5% between 145 and 200 days of gestation (1.3 kg/day). This might be explained by the fact that heifers are still growing (increasing body measurements) and had an average daily gain around 1.0 kg which is not the case of mature cows, which have a reduction in dry matter intake during pregnancy [12, 24, 25]. Similarly, nutrient intake also showed the same pattern as dry matter in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…When comparing dry matter intake (kg/day) at three days of gestation evaluated, we observed an increase of approximately 15.5% between 145 and 200 days of gestation (1.3 kg/day). This might be explained by the fact that heifers are still growing (increasing body measurements) and had an average daily gain around 1.0 kg which is not the case of mature cows, which have a reduction in dry matter intake during pregnancy [12, 24, 25]. Similarly, nutrient intake also showed the same pattern as dry matter in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The RQUICKI index is an excellent indicator of the antilipolytic effect of insulin (Perseghin et al 2001). Models examining high energy intake during the DP have demonstrated a decrease in the index of insulin sensitivity and an increase in insulin values in overfed/overconditioned cows compared to normally-fed cows, and no differences were found in the postpartum insulin sensitivity (or that it was even enhanced) (Rukkwamsuk et al 1998;Locher et al 2015;Salin et al 2017). The RQUICKI index can only be used for the assessment of insulin resistance in cows with the same metabolic status (Schoenberg and Overton 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ad libitum-fed HE group, the actual average energy intake was 144% of the energy requirement of pregnant dairy cow during the first 3 wk of experimental feeding. During the last 3 wk before the predicted parturition, the energy allowance of the HE group decreased by 5% on alternate days by gradually restricting DMI as described in more detail by Salin et al (2017). The average ME was 99 MJ/d in the CON group and 141 MJ/d in the HE group from wk 6 to 4 prepartum, and 109 MJ/d in the CON group and 128 MJ/d in the HE group from wk 3 to 1 prepartum.…”
Section: Animals Diets Samplings and Glucose Tolerance Testsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The selection of samples was random with respect to pairs to represent the design of the whole study. Intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT) were performed on the cows 10 ± 5 d before the actual parturition and 10 ± 1 d postpartum, and the results have been published by Salin et al (2017). The basal NEFA concentrations at 10 ± 5 d before the parturition and 10 ± 1 d postpartum were calculated by averaging the measurements on the blood samples collected 15 and 5 min before the IVGTT (Salin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Animals Diets Samplings and Glucose Tolerance Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation