2022
DOI: 10.1111/ijac.14232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of density and heat treatment of C/C preforms on microstructure and mechanical properties of C/C–SiC composites

Abstract: Twill multidirectional carbon-fiber-reinforced carbon and silicon carbide composites (i.e., C/C-SiC) were prepared via chemical vapor infiltration combined with reactive melt infiltration process. The effect of heat treatment (HT) on the microstructure and mechanical properties of C/C-SiC composites obtained by C/C preforms with different densities was thoroughly investigated. The results show that as the bulk density of C/C preforms increases, the thickness of the pyrolytic carbon (PyC) layer increases and op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volume fraction of each component of the C/C–SiC composite suggests that the CS1 sample contains a higher volume fraction of residual silicon and a lower volume fraction of carbon. This is due to the low density of the C1 sample, which is consistent with previous research results 13 . Furthermore, the closed porosity of CS2 and CS3 samples is slightly higher, possibly due to overlapping pores between the continuous carbon‐fiber cloth layers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The volume fraction of each component of the C/C–SiC composite suggests that the CS1 sample contains a higher volume fraction of residual silicon and a lower volume fraction of carbon. This is due to the low density of the C1 sample, which is consistent with previous research results 13 . Furthermore, the closed porosity of CS2 and CS3 samples is slightly higher, possibly due to overlapping pores between the continuous carbon‐fiber cloth layers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The true density ( ρ true ) of powdered C/C–SiC composites was determined using a gas pycnometer (Ultrapyc 1200e, Quantachrome Instruments). Consequently, the closed porosity ( φ closed ) was determined based on the bulk density, true density, and skeletal density 13 . The calculation formula is as follows: ρbulkbadbreak=m1ρm2m3$$\begin{equation}{\rho }_{bulk} = \frac{{{m}_1{{\rho}}}}{{{m}_2 - {m}_3}}\end{equation}$$ ρskelbadbreak=m1ρm1m3$$\begin{equation}{\rho }_{skel} = \frac{{{m}_1{{\rho}}}}{{{m}_1 - {m}_3}}\end{equation}$$ φopenbadbreak=m2m1m2m3goodbreak×100%$$\begin{equation}{\varphi }_{open} = \frac{{{m}_2 - {m}_1}}{{{m}_2 - {m}_3}} \times 100{\mathrm{\% }}\end{equation}$$ φclosedbadbreak=1/ρskel1/ρtrue1/ρbulkgoodbreak×100%$$\begin{equation}{\varphi }_{closed} = \frac{{1/{\rho }_{skel} - 1/{\rho }_{true}}}{{1/{\rho }_{bulk}}} \times 100{\mathrm{\% }}\end{equation}$$where m 1 , m 2 , and m 3 are dry weight, soaked weight, and suspended weight, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations