2010
DOI: 10.2110/palo.2009.p09-011r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Data Categorization on Paleocommunity Analysis: A Case Study From the Pennsylvanian Finis Shale of Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of possible biases introduced by a chosen technique can be assessed by applying several different collecting methods to a small subset of a target-sampling domain, but such an approach is rarely used in paleoecological studies (but see e.g., Cerridwen and Jones, 1991). Rigorous comparison of different sampling methods will undoubtedly add important insights complementing recent studies addressing the effects of mesh-size (Kidwell, 2002;Kowalewski and Hoffmeister, 2003;Bush et al, 2007), data categorization (Pandolfi, 2001;Forcino et al, 2010), and analytical decisions (Zambito et al, 2008;Visaggi and Ivany, 2010) on recorded paleoecological patterns and will help in their correct interpretation.…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The magnitude of possible biases introduced by a chosen technique can be assessed by applying several different collecting methods to a small subset of a target-sampling domain, but such an approach is rarely used in paleoecological studies (but see e.g., Cerridwen and Jones, 1991). Rigorous comparison of different sampling methods will undoubtedly add important insights complementing recent studies addressing the effects of mesh-size (Kidwell, 2002;Kowalewski and Hoffmeister, 2003;Bush et al, 2007), data categorization (Pandolfi, 2001;Forcino et al, 2010), and analytical decisions (Zambito et al, 2008;Visaggi and Ivany, 2010) on recorded paleoecological patterns and will help in their correct interpretation.…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several studies have demonstrated that palaeoecological analyses can be performed at species, genus, family or even higher levels and that results of the fine and coarse taxonomic resolutions are often strongly correlated (Forcino et al . , ; Geffard Greffard et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Bambach ; Forcino et al . , ; Allmon & Martin ). Biomass data can also be used as the basis of more complex models to estimate the net secondary production and trophic demands and structure of fossil assemblages (e.g.…”
Section: Common Measures Of Biomass With Abbreviations Of Variables mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To alleviate these limitations, the biomass of fossils has also been estimated either by using the skeletal (usually carbonate) mass as a proxy for soft tissue‐based biomass (Waselkov ; Forcino et al . ) or by extrapolating the edible ‘meat mass’ from the skeletal mass in a shell midden (Lyman ). In these types of shell‐mass approaches, fossils must be preserved in their original mineralogy and porosity (shell density), a condition common in dead‐shell assemblages on modern seafloors and in many unlithified sediments.…”
Section: Common Measures Of Biomass With Abbreviations Of Variables mentioning
confidence: 99%