1986
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1986.31.4.0848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of daphnid size and density on interference between Daphnia and Keratella cochlearis1

Abstract: The cladocerans Daphnia pulex, Daphnia ambigua, Daphnia rosea, Daphnia magna, and Daphnia galeata mendotae were tested in the laboratory for their competency to kill Keratella cochlearis (f. tecta) in the course of their normal filter-feeding behavior. At daphnid sizes > 1.2 mm of body length, all five species killed the rotifers at rates that increased with body length as y = 0.485x -0.588 where y is Keratella killed Daphnia-' h-l and x is daphnid body length in mm. No speciesspecific differences in ability t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results show that earlier laboratory studies examining the effects of Daphnia on rotifers were correct in attributing much of the reduction in rotifer numbers to direct interference competition (Gilbert and Stemberger 1985;Burns and Gilbert 1986a;Gilbert 1988b). …”
supporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results show that earlier laboratory studies examining the effects of Daphnia on rotifers were correct in attributing much of the reduction in rotifer numbers to direct interference competition (Gilbert and Stemberger 1985;Burns and Gilbert 1986a;Gilbert 1988b). …”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Bums and Gilbert (1986b) suggested that as food decreases, interference competition should have a greater effect on rotifers. I detected no significant food-Daphnia interactions, however.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been found that the intensity of competition increases with the increase in density (Gilbert, 1985;Burns & Gilbert, 1986;, such as that observed in El Carancho, together with the fact that rotifers can be damaged and even die by action of the filtering appendages of large cladocerans during feeding (MacIsaac & Gilbert, 1991). On the other hand, although B. poopoensis feeds mainly on small algae, as most of the Argentine species of the genus, it has also been reported that it can feed of ciliates, small nauplii and rotifers (Modenutti et al, 1998;Balseiro et al, 2001;Izaguirre et al, 2003;Vignatti, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from physical damage to the rotifer population from Daphnia filtering), as has been suggested for other sites (e.g. Burns & Gilbert, 1986), because experimental studies showed that this does not affect the population dynamics of rotifers and Daphnia in Loch Leven (May & Jones, 1989).…”
Section: Rotifer Zooplankton -Abundancementioning
confidence: 63%