1957
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(57)94630-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of D-Limonene and α-D-Pinene on in Vitro Carbohydrate Dissimilation and Methane Formation by Rumen Bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
8

Year Published

1961
1961
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Although bacteria which convert acetate to methane and carbon dioxide are readily established in enrichment cultures of bovine rumen contents, the data presented in this report demonstrate that only a small portion of rumen methane was derived from acetate and suggest that these organisms were present in small numbers, This observation is in accord with the report (Nelson, Brown & Kingwill, 1960) that the addition of d-limonene to the rumen in vivo in concentrations which were toxic to acetate-utilizing methane bacteria in vitro (Crane, Nelson & Brown, 1957) did not appreciably alter the ratio CO,:CH, in rumen gas. Beijer (1952) previously had observed that methane was not formed from acetate by rumen contents in vitro during short term incubation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although bacteria which convert acetate to methane and carbon dioxide are readily established in enrichment cultures of bovine rumen contents, the data presented in this report demonstrate that only a small portion of rumen methane was derived from acetate and suggest that these organisms were present in small numbers, This observation is in accord with the report (Nelson, Brown & Kingwill, 1960) that the addition of d-limonene to the rumen in vivo in concentrations which were toxic to acetate-utilizing methane bacteria in vitro (Crane, Nelson & Brown, 1957) did not appreciably alter the ratio CO,:CH, in rumen gas. Beijer (1952) previously had observed that methane was not formed from acetate by rumen contents in vitro during short term incubation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, according to some authors, it is mainly the used amount and the source of essential oils that are responsible for the result of reduction or lack of reduction of methane production (Evans and Martin, 2000;Chaves et al, 2008). Crane et al (1957) demonstrated that the addition of a secondary plant metabolite, limonene, can limit the growth of the microorganisms participating in methane formation in the rumen, thus resulting in the reduction of its production. The research by McIntosh et al (2003) showed that the limitation on the number of Methanobrevibacter smithii (measured indirectly through the amount of produced methane) occurred only after using the highest addition (1000 ppm) of the commercial mixture of essential oils, while the lower doses (5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160 ppm) did not adversely affect the population of Methanobrevibacter smithii.…”
Section: The Effect Of Essential Oils On the Process Of Methanogenesimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the biochemical reaction series of anaerobic digestion, methane is formed from acetate (by acetogenic methanogens) and H2/CO2 (by hydrogenotrophic methanogens) [6]. Limonene was found to be inhibitory more for acetogenic methanogens rather than hydrogenotrophic methanogens [9]. Acetic acid consumption was inhibited in the presence of a limonene concentration of 9.10-4 M. Limonene being hydrophobic was prevented diffusing into the hydrophilic membrane.…”
Section: Production Of Methane In the 2 Nd Stage Of Anaerobic Digestimentioning
confidence: 90%