2018
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of customer response to fashion product stockout on holding costs, order sizes, and profitability in omnichannel retailing

Abstract: In retailing practice, customers may actively respond in one of the following ways after experiencing stockout of a preferred brand: switch to a substitutable brand, switch to another store (where the preferred brand could be available), or delay purchase (backlogging). This paper presents a model of active customer responses to stockout of fashion products. In the single-period model, a retailer maximizes profit by selling two substitutable brands through two different stores. Analytical results and numerical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since omnichannel retailing was proposed (Rigby, 2011), some scholars have begun to study the connotation and evolution process of omnichannel retailing (Brynjolfsson et al., 2013; Bell et al., 2014). A few studies have focused on order fulfillment in the omnichannel retailing context (Bernon et al., 2016; Hübner et al., 2016a; Hübner et al., 2016b; Ovezmyradov and Kurata, 2019; Arslan et al., 2021). Based on the operational data of enterprises, some scholars empirically explored the impact of different omnichannel retailing modes on operation efficiency, such as BOPS (Gallino and Moreno, 2014), showrooming (Bell et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021), ship‐to‐store mode (Gallino et al., 2017), “buy online and return to store” (Yan et al., 2020a), and ship‐from‐store (He et al., 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since omnichannel retailing was proposed (Rigby, 2011), some scholars have begun to study the connotation and evolution process of omnichannel retailing (Brynjolfsson et al., 2013; Bell et al., 2014). A few studies have focused on order fulfillment in the omnichannel retailing context (Bernon et al., 2016; Hübner et al., 2016a; Hübner et al., 2016b; Ovezmyradov and Kurata, 2019; Arslan et al., 2021). Based on the operational data of enterprises, some scholars empirically explored the impact of different omnichannel retailing modes on operation efficiency, such as BOPS (Gallino and Moreno, 2014), showrooming (Bell et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021), ship‐to‐store mode (Gallino et al., 2017), “buy online and return to store” (Yan et al., 2020a), and ship‐from‐store (He et al., 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the empirical study of Loureiro and Umberger (2003), consumers pay considerable attention to the country‐of‐origin labeling. After experiencing a stockout of a preferred brand, customers may switch to a substitutable brand, switch to another store, or delay purchases (Ovezmyradov and Kurata, 2019). Extensive research has emphasized the significant influences of prices on consumers' decisions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2020a), Kumar et al. (2019), and Ovezmyradov and Kurata (2019). They show that offline channel establishments are synergistic with existing online channels and would increase product demand.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%