2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cracking reaction on supersonic film cooling using gaseous hydrocarbon fuel as coolant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7][8] The heat sink capability of a hydrocarbon fuel can improve significantly if the fuel undergoes an endothermic cracking reaction before combustion. [9][10][11][12][13] Although cryogenic fuels, such as liquid CH 4 and H 2 , can provide adequate cooling, it requires ample space because of their low densities. Moreover, the cost of fuels, logistics, and safety can be the other issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5][6][7][8] The heat sink capability of a hydrocarbon fuel can improve significantly if the fuel undergoes an endothermic cracking reaction before combustion. [9][10][11][12][13] Although cryogenic fuels, such as liquid CH 4 and H 2 , can provide adequate cooling, it requires ample space because of their low densities. Moreover, the cost of fuels, logistics, and safety can be the other issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists have proposed the concept of “regenerative cooling” using liquid hydrocarbon fuel as one of the efficient cooling methods 5‐8 . The heat sink capability of a hydrocarbon fuel can improve significantly if the fuel undergoes an endothermic cracking reaction before combustion 9‐13 . Although cryogenic fuels, such as liquid CH 4 and H 2 , can provide adequate cooling, it requires ample space because of their low densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Neel et al (1994) found that cooling effectiveness can be improved by increasing the injectant Mach number (without significant changes of mass flow rate). In most cases, tangential jet has higher cooling efficiency and longer cooling length (Zuo et al 2017). Opposing jet is a hot spot of research in recent years (Shen et al 2019), but it is mainly used for cooling at stagnation areas, and its corresponding cooling length is shorter compared with tangential cooling jet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%