1991
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8809(91)90078-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cotton cultivars on feeding of Heliothis armigera and Spodoptera littoralis larvae and on oviposition of Bemisia tabaci

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on biological and ecological information published in the two last decades, the immature developmental time of B. tabaci (from egg to adult) depends on the host plant (Coudriet et al , 1985; Van Lenteren & Noldus, 1990; Bethke et al , 1991; Zalom et al , 1995; Tsai & Wang, 1996; Muñiz & Nombela, 1997; Nava‐Camberos et al , 2001) as well as on the whitefly populations or biotypes (Drost et al , 1998; Muñiz, 2000; Muñiz & Nombela, 2001). The developmental time of B. tabaci recorded at 25 °C ranges from 17.3 to 22.8 days when reared on either aubergine, tomato, sweet potato, cucumber, bean or pepper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on biological and ecological information published in the two last decades, the immature developmental time of B. tabaci (from egg to adult) depends on the host plant (Coudriet et al , 1985; Van Lenteren & Noldus, 1990; Bethke et al , 1991; Zalom et al , 1995; Tsai & Wang, 1996; Muñiz & Nombela, 1997; Nava‐Camberos et al , 2001) as well as on the whitefly populations or biotypes (Drost et al , 1998; Muñiz, 2000; Muñiz & Nombela, 2001). The developmental time of B. tabaci recorded at 25 °C ranges from 17.3 to 22.8 days when reared on either aubergine, tomato, sweet potato, cucumber, bean or pepper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abundance of chewing insects was also associated positively with pubescence density and glandularity, contrary to expectation (Table 5). A few studies have reported positive effects of pubescence density on oviposition and on the abundance of individual species of chewing insect (Robinson et al ., 1980; Lambert & Kilen, 1989; Navon et al ., 1991). Such positive associations could arise because of protection from desiccation or natural enemies, or if chewing insects prefer or can oviposit more effectively on leaves with dense pubescence (Treacy et al ., 1986; Eisner et al ., 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Trichomes may prevent or enhance oviposition by affecting the security with which eggs are attached to leaves (Turnipseed, 1977; Khan & Agarwal, 1984; Ramalho et al ., 1984; Baur et al ., 1991; Lambert et al ., 1992; Webster et al ., 1994; Oghiakhe, 1995; Haddad & Hicks, 2000). Several studies have shown that glandular pubescence or dense pubescence are correlated with higher rates of oviposition, but at least one study found the opposite effect (higher: Lukefahr et al ., 1971; Benedict et al ., 1983; Navasero & Ramaswamy, 1991; Navon et al ., 1991; McAuslane, 1996; lower: Webster et al ., 1975). (2) Trichomes may interfere with the rate of movement of an insect over the leaf surface (Ramalho et al ., 1984; Gannon et al ., 1994; Webster et al ., 1994; Oghiakhe, 1995; Eisner et al ., 1998; Zvereva et al ., 1998; Malakar & Tingey, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Glabrousness, trichome density, latex, acylsugars and glossy foliage have also been linked to resistance. Glabrous cotton cultivars resulted in lower oviposition and few nymphs (Butler et al, 1992, Navon et al, 1991, while glabrous-leafed melons (Cucumis melo) were found to reduce numbers of whitefly stages (adults and nymphs), when compared to commercial pubescent-leafed cultigens (Riley et al, 2001). Higher phenolic and odihydroxy phenolic content of cotton cultivars resulted in fewer eggs oviposited by the Bemisia complex (Butler et al, 1992), and vascular bundle depth was negatively related to B. argentifolii adult and nymph densities (Chu et al, 1998).…”
Section: Whitefly Resistance In Cultivated Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%