2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cooling rate on the microstructure control and liquid–liquid phase separation behavior of Cu–Fe–P immiscible alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can also be seen from Table 3 that the Co element mainly appears in the α-Fe phase. Element P is not found in either phases of Figure 6 a, because the solid solubility of element P in α-Fe and Cu-rich phases is very limited, so they tend to be enriched at defects, such as grain boundaries and sintering pores [ 45 ].…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be seen from Table 3 that the Co element mainly appears in the α-Fe phase. Element P is not found in either phases of Figure 6 a, because the solid solubility of element P in α-Fe and Cu-rich phases is very limited, so they tend to be enriched at defects, such as grain boundaries and sintering pores [ 45 ].…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it was observed that the particle sizes of second precipitations in these immiscible alloys were obviously decreased, which might be due to the weakening effect of Co addition on the Marangoni convection during the solidification process, However, the decrease of Marangoni convection in immiscible alloys was reported to be attributed to the changes of interfacial energy between L 1 and L 2 before and after the addition of Co. Cho et al reported that as for Cu–Fe alloy the addition of Zr was highly effective to activate γ-Fe nucleation by decreasing the mixing enthalpy and also accelerating heterogeneous nucleation, resulting in the significant microstructure evolution of immiscible alloys . Furthermore, the density difference between the two liquid phases could also be reduced to a certain extent, resulting in the weakening of liquid phase separation caused by stokes motion . Besides these, the catalytic properties of Fe–P@Cu alloy before and after the addition of Co were also evaluated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Furthermore, the density difference between the two liquid phases could also be reduced to a certain extent, resulting in the weakening of liquid phase separation caused by stokes motion. 36 Besides these, the catalytic properties of Fe−P@Cu alloy before and after the addition of Co were also evaluated. Due to the obvious refinement of the second phase with Co addition, more active sites of (Fe x Co 1−x ) 2 P would be exposed, resulting in the improvement of catalytic performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-lubricating wear resistance of Al-Bi immiscible alloys arises from the strength of the Al matrix with a well-dispersed soft Bi phase. Therefore, control of the dispersion of Bi-rich droplets can potentially improve the performance of Al-Bi immiscible alloys [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%