1981
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.282.6269.1032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cooking on serum glucose and insulin responses to starch.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
39
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present case, cornstarch therapy was quite beneficial. The effect of cornstarch does not appear to be due to immune mechanisms, but simply to the provision of a sustainable supply of glucose throughout the night without causing sharp rises in the blood glucose levels (13). This explanation is consistent with the observation in this case that the hypoglycemic episodes resolved on the very night that cornstarch therapy was initiated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the present case, cornstarch therapy was quite beneficial. The effect of cornstarch does not appear to be due to immune mechanisms, but simply to the provision of a sustainable supply of glucose throughout the night without causing sharp rises in the blood glucose levels (13). This explanation is consistent with the observation in this case that the hypoglycemic episodes resolved on the very night that cornstarch therapy was initiated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Heating is capable of increasing the hydrolysis of lactose into glucose and galactose [4], and this may explain the higher response which was observed after cooked milk. Cooking has also a splitting or gelatinizing effect on starch, making it more easily available for enzymatic hydrolysis [5,6]. However, this does not explain the present results, because the starch in the oatmeal porridge was cooked in a similar way in all test meals.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The former includes the ratio of amylose to amylopectin present in the raw food (Behall et al, 1988) and the type of monosaccharide components, the amount and type of dietary fiber (Jenkins et al, 1978), the presence of large amounts of fat or protein (Nuttall et al, 1984;Wolever et al, 1985;Collier et al, 1986;Bornet et al, 1987), antinutrients such as phytic acid, lectins and tannins (Yoon et al, 1983;Thompson et al, 1984;Rea et al, 1985) and nutrient -starch interactions in carbohydrate-containing foods, such as in wheat products (Jenkins et al, 1987a). Extrusion, flaking, grinding, canning, storing and cooking of the carbohydrate-containing foods can affect the particle size and the integrity of the starch granules (Jenkins et al, 1988a) and plant cell walls (Ellis et al, 1991), making the carbohydrate portion more accessible to digestive enzymes (Wolever, 1990;Collins et al, 1981).…”
Section: Glycemic Index and The Slow-release Carbohydratementioning
confidence: 99%