1983
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-198304000-00032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Conventional and High Frequency Jet Ventilation on Lung Parenchyma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I9 Clinical reports describing resolution of preexisting severe pulmonary interstitial emphysema in newborns treated with HFJV suggest that these lower airway pressures may indeed be less damaging and allow resolution of existing baroinjury.20.21 Animal studies looking at the effects of HFJV on lung parenchyma have not been conclusive. In an earlier study, we demonstrated less hyperaeration (alveolar emphysema) compared to CV controls in the lungs of normal dogs ventilated by HFJV for up to 24 h. 16 By contrast, Quan et al, using saline lavaged rabbits, found no histologic difference between lungs exposed to CV and HFJV for 4 h. 22 An unintentional effect of lowering peak and mean airway pressures during high frequency ventilation is the development of progressive, diffuse atelectasis leading to a deterioration of oxygenation.899223 The addition of sigh breaths can counteract this phenomenon but may be associated with adverse effects unless carefully controlled. Ackerman et a1 reported on the findings of pulmonary interstitial emphysema and pseudocysts in immature baboons with hyaline membrane disease who were ventilated with a high frequency interruptor and intermittent manual sighs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…I9 Clinical reports describing resolution of preexisting severe pulmonary interstitial emphysema in newborns treated with HFJV suggest that these lower airway pressures may indeed be less damaging and allow resolution of existing baroinjury.20.21 Animal studies looking at the effects of HFJV on lung parenchyma have not been conclusive. In an earlier study, we demonstrated less hyperaeration (alveolar emphysema) compared to CV controls in the lungs of normal dogs ventilated by HFJV for up to 24 h. 16 By contrast, Quan et al, using saline lavaged rabbits, found no histologic difference between lungs exposed to CV and HFJV for 4 h. 22 An unintentional effect of lowering peak and mean airway pressures during high frequency ventilation is the development of progressive, diffuse atelectasis leading to a deterioration of oxygenation.899223 The addition of sigh breaths can counteract this phenomenon but may be associated with adverse effects unless carefully controlled. Ackerman et a1 reported on the findings of pulmonary interstitial emphysema and pseudocysts in immature baboons with hyaline membrane disease who were ventilated with a high frequency interruptor and intermittent manual sighs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The effect of 24 hours of HFJV on lung parenchyma in anesthetized dogs is indistinguishable from that of PPV [9]. High-frequency jet ventilation also promotes alveolar recruitment of atelectactic lung [10], and is no different from optimized PPV in avoiding dynamic hyperinflation of end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Animal studies fail to show an increase in atelectasis or barotrauma with HFJV versus conventional ventilation (Keszler et al, 1982).…”
Section: Nursing Implications Respiratory Statusmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The medical community has explored alternatives to conventional ventilation techniques in an attempt to provide adequate gas exchange while decreasing the incidence of iatrogenic lung disease (Carlo, Chatburn, & Martin, 1987;Keszler, Klein, McClellan, Nelson, & Platt, 1982;Polak & Neu, 1988;Special Conference Report, 1983). High-frequency ventilation has been under investigation since the 1960s as an alternative treatment modality (Spitzer, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%