2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of contrasting concentrate feeding strategies on meat quality of growing and finishing dairy bulls offered grass silage and barley based diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no difference in instrumental tenderness observed among treatments in this study. This is in agreement with other studies that also reported no difference in instrumental tenderness between grass-fed and grain finished beef [ 95 , 96 , 97 ]. However, other studies have shown that tenderness is inversely related to age, with tenderness decreasing as age increases [ 98 , 99 , 100 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There was no difference in instrumental tenderness observed among treatments in this study. This is in agreement with other studies that also reported no difference in instrumental tenderness between grass-fed and grain finished beef [ 95 , 96 , 97 ]. However, other studies have shown that tenderness is inversely related to age, with tenderness decreasing as age increases [ 98 , 99 , 100 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Samples were dried and milled using a Wiley Mill No1 (Arthur Thomas Co, Philadelphia, USA) through a 2‐mm screen to determine DM and nitrogen (AOAC, ); and intramuscular fat (IMF) was measured using the Soxhlet petroleum‐ether extraction method for 8 hr of a lyophilized sample (Anonymous, ). Shear force was measured to determine mechanical tenderness (C‐LM 3B Digital Display Muscle Tenderness Meter, Harbin, China) according to the modified Warner‐Bratzler method (Manni, Rinne, Huuskonen, & Huhtanen, ). Six cylindrical samples of 1.5 cm diameter were collected from a steak of 2.5 cm thick from each yak for the measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carcass and meat quality of ruminants is affected by many factors (Dannenberger et al 2006), and of these, diet is likely the foremost. The previous studies reported that bulls could adapt to different feeding strategies without significant effect on meat quality (Manni et al 2018). Also, Alfaia et al (2009) considered that a high-forage diet had nutritional advantages for ruminants and conducive for the activity of cellulose-decomposing bacteria, which synthesized intermediate isomers, biohydrogenated intermediate isomers trans11-18:1 (t11-18:1) and cis9, trans11-18:2 (c9, t11-18:2) and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) of meat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%