2012
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2011.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of continuously enhanced corticotropin releasing factor expression within the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis on conditioned and unconditioned anxiety

Abstract: The lateral division of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), which forms part of the circuitry regulating fear and anxiety, contains a large number of neurons expressing corticotropin releasing factor (CRF), a neuropeptide that plays a prominent role in the etiology of fear- and anxiety-related psychopathologies. Stress increases CRF expression within BNST neurons, implicating these cells in stress- and anxiety-related behaviors. These experiments examined the effect of chronically enhanced CRF expr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
91
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(86 reference statements)
5
91
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using specific CRF 1 and CRF 2 receptor antagonists, we found circumstantial evidence for both converging and opposing receptor functions, dependent on the behavior under investigation. Although our results support previous reports of CRF receptor function on the anxiety-like behavior in the EPM (Sahuque et al, 2006;Sink et al, 2013) and modulation of somatic pain processing (Ji and Neugebauer, 2008), the observed changes in visceral sensitivity contradicted previous studies using peripherally restricted CRF 1 and CRF 2 receptor antagonists (Greenwood- Nijsen et al, 2005). This suggested that the effects of CRF 1 and CRF 2 receptor activation, at least on visceral sensitivity, may differ depending on the localization of the receptors.…”
Section: The Effect Of Was On Crf Mechanisms In the Bnst Alcontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using specific CRF 1 and CRF 2 receptor antagonists, we found circumstantial evidence for both converging and opposing receptor functions, dependent on the behavior under investigation. Although our results support previous reports of CRF receptor function on the anxiety-like behavior in the EPM (Sahuque et al, 2006;Sink et al, 2013) and modulation of somatic pain processing (Ji and Neugebauer, 2008), the observed changes in visceral sensitivity contradicted previous studies using peripherally restricted CRF 1 and CRF 2 receptor antagonists (Greenwood- Nijsen et al, 2005). This suggested that the effects of CRF 1 and CRF 2 receptor activation, at least on visceral sensitivity, may differ depending on the localization of the receptors.…”
Section: The Effect Of Was On Crf Mechanisms In the Bnst Alcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…However, recent findings using similar CRF overexpression techniques in the BNST suggested that regulation of stress-induced anxiety in this brain region may depend more on the CRF receptors (Sink et al, 2013). Thus, our following experiments focused on delineating the function of the CRF receptors, which were disproportionally upregulated after WAS.…”
Section: The Effect Of Was On Crf Mechanisms In the Bnst Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Crh gene over-expression within the BNST increased the sustained fear response towards a previously conditioned fear cue 66 . Crh over-expression was followed by a decreased CRHR1 receptor density within the BNST suggesting that "behavioral effects may be mediated by enhanced CRH receptor signaling or compensatory changes in CRF receptor density within these structures" 66 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crh over-expression was followed by a decreased CRHR1 receptor density within the BNST suggesting that "behavioral effects may be mediated by enhanced CRH receptor signaling or compensatory changes in CRF receptor density within these structures" 66 . Importantly, CRH over-expression was impairing anxiety responses towards threat cues if administered prior to conditioning, and also, limbic CRHR1 was shown to be required for the enhancement of fear memory consolidation 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRF 1 receptors also differentially affect these two aversive states in rodents (Refojo et al, 2011;Sink et al, 2013). In this species, sustained anxiety is maintained by activation of CRF 1 receptors and blocked by BNST infusion of CRH 1 antagonists (Davis et al, 2010;Lee and Davis, 1997), whereas fear is either not affected or even enhanced by CRF 1 antagonists (Meloni et al, 2006;Walker et al, 2009a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%