2012
DOI: 10.5665/sleep.2226
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Neurocognitive Function in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: The Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES)

Abstract: Kushida CA; Nichols DA; Holmes TH; Quan SF; Walsh JK; Gottlieb DJ; Simon RD; Guilleminault C; White DP; Goodwin JL; Schweitzer PK; Leary EB; Hyde PR; Hirshkowitz M; Green S; McEvoy LK; Chan C; Gevins A; Kay GG; Bloch DA; Crabtree T; Demen WC. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on neurocognitive function in obstructive sleep apnea patients: the Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES). SLEEP 2012;35(12):1593-1602.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
259
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(278 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
10
259
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In our sample, age and education explained most of the relationship between neurocognitive function and OSA in those older than 55 years. In accordance with our study, 36,37 education was the variable that mostly explained neurocognitive performance in the Apnea Positive Pressure Long-Term Efficacy Study, a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 1,204 adults (mean age 51 years) that evaluated continuous positive airway pressure and neurocognitive function in OSA. 37 The results of our study could be partly explained by our sample and methodologic differences.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 77%
“…In our sample, age and education explained most of the relationship between neurocognitive function and OSA in those older than 55 years. In accordance with our study, 36,37 education was the variable that mostly explained neurocognitive performance in the Apnea Positive Pressure Long-Term Efficacy Study, a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 1,204 adults (mean age 51 years) that evaluated continuous positive airway pressure and neurocognitive function in OSA. 37 The results of our study could be partly explained by our sample and methodologic differences.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Indeed, several studies investigating the effects of CPAP on glucose metabolism have reported lower average duration of sham-CPAP adherence as compared with therapeutic CPAP (20,21,29,30). A large randomized controlled multicenter trial (56), comparing the effects of therapeutic versus sham-CPAP, reported significantly lower adherence to sham-CPAP and a lower retention rate in the sham-CPAP group. Another large randomized controlled multicenter trial (57) also reported lower duration of sham-CPAP use as compared with active CPAP.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in the study by Kushida and colleagues (56), about two-thirds of sham participants correctly guessed their treatment assignment, which raises the possibility of unblinding when sham-CPAP is used. In a recent randomized crossover trial of active versus sham-CPAP (58), when the patients were asked about their treatment experience before unblinding, most were able to identify the active CPAP as the more effective treatment.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26] CPAP has shown mixed success in rectifying these impairments, 23,[26][27][28][29] although lingering posttreatment impairments are not uncommon. 23,30,31 In contrast, several large-scale studies in recent years have found cognitive impairment to be mild or nonsignificant in patients with OSA compared to control patients.…”
Section: ) (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%