2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2012.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of conservation tillage on soil aggregation and aggregate binding agents in black soil of Northeast China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
100
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Formation and stabilization of aggregates in soil mainly depend on the amount of biomass input and the rate of organic matter mineralization (Blanco-Canqui and Lal, 2004). Similarly, the increased amounts of 4.0-2.0 mm aggregates in the NT tillage practice was also reported by Zhang et al (2012) and Du et al (2013) in long term experiments. Moreover, Zhang et al (2012) found that the >2.0 mm aggregate size in a clay loam soil was higher under no-tillage in comparison to conventional tillage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Formation and stabilization of aggregates in soil mainly depend on the amount of biomass input and the rate of organic matter mineralization (Blanco-Canqui and Lal, 2004). Similarly, the increased amounts of 4.0-2.0 mm aggregates in the NT tillage practice was also reported by Zhang et al (2012) and Du et al (2013) in long term experiments. Moreover, Zhang et al (2012) found that the >2.0 mm aggregate size in a clay loam soil was higher under no-tillage in comparison to conventional tillage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For conventional practices, this may be due to tillage causing the destruction of the aggregates conserving organic matter and in turn the increased temperature and aeration of the soil. Many studies reported that higher SOC contents in aggregates were found in conservation tillage systems in comparison to conventional tillage practices (Pinherio et al, 2004;Bhattacharyya et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2012;Andruschkewitsch et al, 2014). 9.6 ± 0.7 d 9.5 ± 0.6 c 8.5 ± 0.4 b 9.6 ± 0.6 d CT2…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbon Accumulation In Different Aggregate Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, NT can promote soil surface macro-aggregation and improve structural stability due to lower soil disturbance and higher SOC, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and microbial biomass and glomalin, which are more important driving factors for aggregate stability, and consequently enhance C retention (Castro et al, 1998;Blanco-Moure et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2012Zhang et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishment of perennial vegetation following cultivation showed the positive effects of root length, microbial biomass, and mycorrhizae on aggregate formation Jastrow et al, 1998;Miller and Jastrow, 1990). Based on much of the experimental work done to date, additional biological factors influence aggregation, including the positive influences of microbial biomass and by-products (Zhang et al, 2012), mycorrhizae (Wilson et al, 2009), and soil fauna such as Collembola (Siddiky et al, 2012a,b) and nematodes . Recent work has shown strong positive links between root biomass and the abundance of nematodes and several taxa of mesofauna (Eisenhauer et al, 2013), suggesting that changes in root biomass alters the structure of soil food webs, changing belowground C cycling and the mean residence time of different SOC pools (Reid et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%