Innovations as Key to the Green Revolution in Africa 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2543-2_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Conservation Tillage, Crop Residue and Cropping Systems on Changes in Soil Organic Matter and Maize–Legume Production: A Case Study in Teso District

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increases in yields of wheat and maize noticed in the current study owing to the application of the organic amendments agree with findings reported by Cherif et al (2009), Alemazadeh andKazemeini (2010) and Blaser et al (2012). Rasool et al (2008), Anyanzwa et al (2010) and Chivenge et al (2011) reported significant increases in maize productivity due to application of the organic amendments. Treatments receiving the organic amendments, especially at the higher application rates showed significant higher organic carbon after cropping.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The increases in yields of wheat and maize noticed in the current study owing to the application of the organic amendments agree with findings reported by Cherif et al (2009), Alemazadeh andKazemeini (2010) and Blaser et al (2012). Rasool et al (2008), Anyanzwa et al (2010) and Chivenge et al (2011) reported significant increases in maize productivity due to application of the organic amendments. Treatments receiving the organic amendments, especially at the higher application rates showed significant higher organic carbon after cropping.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is peculiar that residue retention combined with mineral fertilizer did not have a beneficial impact on upper soil C as found in numerous other studies (Vanlauwe et al, 2001;Bationo et al, 2007;Chivenge et al, 2007;Anyanzwa et al, 2010;Chivenge et al, 2011). A possible explanation could be the low residue cover in the present study.…”
Section: Tillage and Residue Management Effects On Soil (Aggregate) Csupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Numerous field studies reported increased yields from crop residue application in addition to mineral fertilizer (Palm et al, 2001;Vanlauwe et al, 2001;Anyanzwa et al, 2010), especially under reduced tillage (Govaerts et al, 2005). In our study, the total average soybean grain yield under reduced tillage without residue retention (-T-R) was 45% lower than under the other treatments.…”
Section: Tillage and Residue Management Effects On Maize And Soybean mentioning
confidence: 41%
“…It is also worth noting that the N in plant components was significantly different across treatments and which if retained as crop residues could improve soil fertility, water retention, and crop yields (Anyanzwa et al, 2010; Gentile et al, 2009; Tongwane et al, 2016). Crop residue retention could also cause higher N 2 O emissions (Basche et al, 2014; Peyrard et al, 2016); however, retention of crop residues on the field is not a common practice in the study area as the maize stalks are used as animal feeds and as fuel for cooking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%