2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2009.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of conservation agriculture techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
259
5
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
14
259
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive responses to CA are principally the result of the interacting effect of soil characteristics and climate [1]. One of these benefits is attributed to the water-harvesting effects of minimum-tillage practices [50,51]. Underwater limited conditions increased soil moisture, leading to comparably higher yields under CA [9].…”
Section: Implications Of Growing Conditions On Yield Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive responses to CA are principally the result of the interacting effect of soil characteristics and climate [1]. One of these benefits is attributed to the water-harvesting effects of minimum-tillage practices [50,51]. Underwater limited conditions increased soil moisture, leading to comparably higher yields under CA [9].…”
Section: Implications Of Growing Conditions On Yield Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assessment of more than 60 economic studies of various management practices ranging from alley cropping to tillage and fertilizer indicates that water management strategies increase net returns and purchasing power parity of households much more than any other and perhaps presents the only viable pathway to help transition smallholder farmers out of poverty (Harris and Orr 2014). Without a doubt, the ability to supply water, mitigate the impacts of variable rainfall on crops, pasture and animals, and extend growing seasons has significant impacts on smallholder livelihoods, increasing yields and economic returns (Burney and Naylor 2012;Kurwakumire et al 2014;Thierfelder and Wall 2009;Gebrehiwot et al 2015). As an alternative to establishing irrigation schemes, more passive water harvesting techniques can equally yield big gains for smallholders.…”
Section: Water Use Efficiency and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on soil type, frequent tillage may cause the development of a hardpan at the bottom of the ploughed or hoe cultivated layer which can impede water infiltration and root penetration (Thierfelder and Wall, 2009). Irrespective of SOM, tillage damages soil structure, and hence soil water holding and release characteristics, through physical disruption of soil aggregates (Beare et al, 1994).…”
Section: Tillage and Economic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regular tillage breaks down soil organic matter through mineralization, more so in warmer climates (Kirschbaum, 1995), thus contributing to deteriorating soil physical, chemical and biological properties (Wall, 2007). The physical effects of tillage also adversely affect soil structure, with consequences for water infiltration and soil erosion through runoff, and create hardpans below the plough layer (Thierfelder and Wall, 2009). These adverse effects of tillage have been addressed over recent decades by the development of conservation agriculture (CA) (GarciaTorres et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%