2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-022-4991-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of confining pressure on deformation failure behavior of jointed rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress applied process was displacement loading, and the quasistatic loading state was maintained. The samples all failed within 5-15 min [35,36].…”
Section: Effect Of Water Content On Shale Strengthmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The stress applied process was displacement loading, and the quasistatic loading state was maintained. The samples all failed within 5-15 min [35,36].…”
Section: Effect Of Water Content On Shale Strengthmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The movement combination of the rock formation is determined by the strength factors of each rock formation (including lithology, thickness, and elastic modulus). The upper layers with low strength factors will move simultaneously with the lower layers with high strength factors and have the same sinking curvature, while the upper layers with high strength factors will gradually delaminate from the lower layers with low strength factors [21,22].…”
Section: Analysis Of Combined-strata Structure In Working Facementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pan (2021) et al [23] studied the influence of joint angles on dynamic response characteristics of rock materials, such as dynamic strength, energy dissipation, and microscopic damage. Chen (2022) et al [24] performed a numerical simulation of joints under different rock static pressure carried out by a discrete element program, and the influence of joint inclination and static rock pressure on stress and strain curves, rupture patterns, and contact force distribution of joint specimens is revealed. Wang (2023) et al [25] tested the cyclic loading and unloading of jointed sandstone with different limit stress ratios, and it is proposed that when the limit stress ratio of jointed sandstone is greater than or equal to 0.90, jointed sandstone is damaged during circulation and fatigue frequency decreases with the increase of limit stress ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%