1981
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(81)90069-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of concurrent hemisphere-specific activity on unimanual tapping rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular interest is the finding that silent reading causes asymmetric interference, for this has not been shown previously in children. It has been found that silent reading disrupts right-hand performance more than left-hand performance in normal adults, although it is not clear whether the asymmetry is as great as when vocalization is required (Bowers, Heilman, Satz, & Altman, 1978;Heilige & Longstreth, 1981). In the present study, the hand effect for the silent-reading task was smaller than that for the reading-aloud task (estimated OJ 2 = .20 and .39, respectively).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of particular interest is the finding that silent reading causes asymmetric interference, for this has not been shown previously in children. It has been found that silent reading disrupts right-hand performance more than left-hand performance in normal adults, although it is not clear whether the asymmetry is as great as when vocalization is required (Bowers, Heilman, Satz, & Altman, 1978;Heilige & Longstreth, 1981). In the present study, the hand effect for the silent-reading task was smaller than that for the reading-aloud task (estimated OJ 2 = .20 and .39, respectively).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Similarly, recitation of the tongue twister decreased tapping rate by 27%, compared with the 6%-8% reduction for the line-orientation task. Comparison of tasks with and without vocalization has yielded similar, but somewhat weaker, differenees in adults (Heilige & Longstreth, 1981;Hicks, Provenzano, & Rybstein, 1975).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Oral reading and speaking in general (Dalby, 1980;Hellige & Longstreth, 1981;Hiscock, Antoniuk, Prisciak, & von Hessert, 1985;Hiscock, Cheesman, Inch, Chipuer, & Graf, 1989;Singh, 1989) have been well established since the first experiments by Kinsbourne and Cook (1971) and Hicks (1975) as activities that interfere with the right hand more than the left. The left hemisphere typically controls speech production and distal movements of the right hand and the right hemisphere controls distal activity of the left hand.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Right-handed individuals typically demonstrate a greater interference with right-hand performance than left-hand performance (e.g., Hellige & Longstreth, 1981;Kee, Bathurst, & Hellige, 1983;Kinsboume & Cook, 1971). According to the cerebral functional distance theory of Kinsbourne and Hicks (1978), the brain centers for controlling speech and the right hand are more likely to have neural crosstalk and thus produce interference because they reside in the same hemisphere.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 98%