2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of compacting activated carbons on their volumetric CO2 adsorption performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in packing density observed on compaction of the present activated carbon composites is consistent with previous reports on the compaction or densification of purely carbonaceous activated carbons. Increases in packing density above 20% have been observed when activated carbons are compacted at pressure of 399 MPa or 887 MPa, 56 or even at lower compaction pressure of 55 MPa. 57 Furthermore, the packing density of high surface area activated carbons (LMA726 and LMA738) has been reported to rise by more than 40% after compaction at 74 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in packing density observed on compaction of the present activated carbon composites is consistent with previous reports on the compaction or densification of purely carbonaceous activated carbons. Increases in packing density above 20% have been observed when activated carbons are compacted at pressure of 399 MPa or 887 MPa, 56 or even at lower compaction pressure of 55 MPa. 57 Furthermore, the packing density of high surface area activated carbons (LMA726 and LMA738) has been reported to rise by more than 40% after compaction at 74 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different results when studied at different densities, therefore, density was not chosen to be more convincing for the characterization of the adsorption properties of CO 2 . As reported in the literature [ 62 ], the dynamic CO 2 adsorption performance of MA powder was investigated in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA Q500, TA Corp, New Castle, DE, USA). As shown in Figure 7 A,B, comparing the CO 2 adsorption properties measured by the presented CO 2 adsorption measurement technique and gravimetric adsorption, it was found that the adsorption amounts determined by these two methods were essentially the same, indicating that the presented adsorption measurement can be employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been very little work on the volumetric adsorption of CO 2 by ZIFs. However, the gravimetric capacity cannot represent the actual processing capacity of the adsorbent under specific working conditions. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%