2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of common ions on the flotation of fluorapatite and dolomite with oleate collector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As presented in Figure 11B, separation peaks with a deviation of 0.40 eV for indeterminate carbon oxides (contamination) and 0.19 eV for hydrocarbons at 532.13 and 531.67 eV, respectively, were found on treated dolomite, in comparison with bare dolomite, demonstrating the adsorption of GJBW onto dolomite 55 . As exhibited in Figure 11C,D, not only did the bare dolomite attain double peaks of Ca 2p1/2 and Ca 2p3/2 at 350.78 and 347.07 eV, respectively, but it also involved the peak of Mg 1s at 1304.63 eV, being well in line with previous research 29,56 . Apart from separated peaks of Ca 2p1/2, Ca 2p3/2, and Mg 1s located at 350.68, 347.08, and 1305.38 eV, respectively, three new spectral peaks at 351.35, 347.75, and 1303.62 eV were observed on dolomite treated via GJBW.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As presented in Figure 11B, separation peaks with a deviation of 0.40 eV for indeterminate carbon oxides (contamination) and 0.19 eV for hydrocarbons at 532.13 and 531.67 eV, respectively, were found on treated dolomite, in comparison with bare dolomite, demonstrating the adsorption of GJBW onto dolomite 55 . As exhibited in Figure 11C,D, not only did the bare dolomite attain double peaks of Ca 2p1/2 and Ca 2p3/2 at 350.78 and 347.07 eV, respectively, but it also involved the peak of Mg 1s at 1304.63 eV, being well in line with previous research 29,56 . Apart from separated peaks of Ca 2p1/2, Ca 2p3/2, and Mg 1s located at 350.68, 347.08, and 1305.38 eV, respectively, three new spectral peaks at 351.35, 347.75, and 1303.62 eV were observed on dolomite treated via GJBW.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Figure 10 delineates the species distribution over the full pH range for NaOl at a concentration of 10 mg/L 46 . At pH 5, NaOl existed mostly as RCOOH molecules, but it also generated significant amounts of RCOO − and H (RCOO) 2− ions, being prone to interacting with Ca 2+ or Mg 2+ on dolomite 29 and demonstrating that at the same concentration, GJBW could ionize more RCOO − and H (RCOO) 2− ions than could NaOl. GJBW interacts with dolomite more extensively than does NaOl.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fe and Al atoms are partly present on the dolomite surface, and the other part will enter the dolomite lattice through homogeneity and lattice substitution, which will cause impurity defects in the dolomite crystal structure. The influence of metal atoms present on the dolomite surface on its surface properties has been studied extensively by numerous authors using the zeta potential analysis, surface morphology analysis, energy spectroscopy, and determination of adsorption (Chen et al, 2022;Huang et al, 2021;Ruan et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2019). However, the influence of impurity defects on the surface properties of dolomite due to the presence of metal atoms inside the dolomite lattice is difficult to study by experimental means.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%