2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-019-01412-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of commercial microbial biostimulants on soil and root microbial communities and sugarcane yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings contrast with previous studies showing minor and/or transient ecological impact of Azospirillum inoculants on the resident bacterial community colonizing the rhizosphere ( Ambrosini et al, 2016 ), by molecular fingerprinting in the case of maize ( Herschkovitz et al, 2005 ; Lerner et al, 2006 ; Matsumura et al, 2015 ), wheat ( Naiman et al, 2009 ; Baudoin et al, 2010 ), rice ( Pedraza et al, 2009 ; García de Salamone et al, 2010 , 2012 ; Bao et al, 2013 ), or other crops ( Correa et al, 2007 ; Felici et al, 2008 ), as well as by Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding in the case of maize ( da Costa et al, 2018 ). Modest inoculant impacts on the rhizobacterial community were also found with Bacillus on lettuce (by metagenomics; Kröber et al, 2014 ) and tomato (by pyrosequencing; Qiao et al, 2017 ), Pseudomonas on lettuce (by DGGE and pyrosequencing; Schreiter et al, 2014 ), Pseudomonas or Achromobacter on maize (by Illumina MiSeq; da Costa et al, 2018 ), Stenotrophomonas on maize (by Illumina MiSeq; Kusstatscher et al, 2020 ), multispecies inoculants on tomato (by Illumina MiSeq; Nuzzo et al, 2020 ) and wheat (by pyrosequencing; Dal Cortivo et al, 2020 ), or a multispecies organic amendment on sugarcane (by Illumina MiSeq; Berg et al, 2019 ), whereas a larger impact was observed by Illumina MiSeq with Pseudomonas on maize ( Ke et al, 2019 ) and different oilseed crops ( Jiménez et al, 2020 ); Pseudomonas , Paenibacillus , or Bacillus on lettuce ( Passera et al, 2020 ); an organic amendment enriched in microorganisms on strawberry ( Deng et al, 2019 ); or a multispecies inoculant on onion ( Pellegrini et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings contrast with previous studies showing minor and/or transient ecological impact of Azospirillum inoculants on the resident bacterial community colonizing the rhizosphere ( Ambrosini et al, 2016 ), by molecular fingerprinting in the case of maize ( Herschkovitz et al, 2005 ; Lerner et al, 2006 ; Matsumura et al, 2015 ), wheat ( Naiman et al, 2009 ; Baudoin et al, 2010 ), rice ( Pedraza et al, 2009 ; García de Salamone et al, 2010 , 2012 ; Bao et al, 2013 ), or other crops ( Correa et al, 2007 ; Felici et al, 2008 ), as well as by Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding in the case of maize ( da Costa et al, 2018 ). Modest inoculant impacts on the rhizobacterial community were also found with Bacillus on lettuce (by metagenomics; Kröber et al, 2014 ) and tomato (by pyrosequencing; Qiao et al, 2017 ), Pseudomonas on lettuce (by DGGE and pyrosequencing; Schreiter et al, 2014 ), Pseudomonas or Achromobacter on maize (by Illumina MiSeq; da Costa et al, 2018 ), Stenotrophomonas on maize (by Illumina MiSeq; Kusstatscher et al, 2020 ), multispecies inoculants on tomato (by Illumina MiSeq; Nuzzo et al, 2020 ) and wheat (by pyrosequencing; Dal Cortivo et al, 2020 ), or a multispecies organic amendment on sugarcane (by Illumina MiSeq; Berg et al, 2019 ), whereas a larger impact was observed by Illumina MiSeq with Pseudomonas on maize ( Ke et al, 2019 ) and different oilseed crops ( Jiménez et al, 2020 ); Pseudomonas , Paenibacillus , or Bacillus on lettuce ( Passera et al, 2020 ); an organic amendment enriched in microorganisms on strawberry ( Deng et al, 2019 ); or a multispecies inoculant on onion ( Pellegrini et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that microbial biostimulants are relatively common in agriculture, usually through PGPR products or vermicomposts, their effect on microbiomes is poorly documented. Berg S. et al (2020) studied the effect of microbial biostimulants on soil and root microbial communities. Although no significant differences were found in the diversity of these communities, except for the fungi, the tested biostimulants did not increase the yield.…”
Section: Microbial Biostimulantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies highlight the opportunity for in situ extraction from agricultural regions overlying P-rich bedrock where granules of underlying rock fragments are mixed with the upper productive soil horizons. In these cases, nutrient delivery could be achieved through inoculation with active bacterial and fungal strains [52,53].…”
Section: Geological P Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%