Objective-Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest improves survival and functional outcomes, whereas hyperthermia is harmful. The optimal method of tracking the effect of temperature on neurologic recovery after cardiac arrest has not been elucidated. We studied the recovery of cortical electrical function by quantitative electroencephalography after 7-min asphyxial cardiac arrest, using information quantity (IQ).
Design-Laboratory investigation.Setting-University medical school and animal research facility.
Subjects-A total of 28 male Wistar rats.Interventions-Using an asphyxial cardiac arrest rodent model, we tracked quantitative electroencephalography of 6-hr immediate postresuscitation hypothermia (at 33°C), normothermia (37°C), or hyperthermia (39°C) (N=8 per group). Neurological recovery was evaluated using the Neurological Deficit Score. Four rats were included as a sham control group.
Measurements and MainResults-Greater recovery of IQ was found in rats treated with hypothermia (IQ=0.74), compared to normothermia (IQ=0.60) and hyperthermia (IQ=0.56) (p<. 001). Analysis at different intervals demonstrated a significant separation of IQ scores among the temperature groups within the first 2 hrs postresuscitation (p<.01). IQ values of >0.523 at 60 mins postresuscitation predicted good neurological outcome (72-hr Neurological Deficit Score of≥60) with a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 81.8%. IQ was also significantly lower in rats that died prematurely compared to survivors (p<.001). IQ values correlated strongly with 72-hr Neurological Deficit Score as early as 30 mins post-cardiac arrest (Pearson correlation 0.735, p<.01) and maintained a significant association throughout the 72-hr experiment. No IQ difference was noted in sham rats with temperature manipulation. Approximately 164,600 cardiac arrests (CAs) occur in the United States each year (1). Among initial survivors, 80% remain comatose after resuscitation (2) and neurological complications represent the leading cause of disability (3,4). The ischemic brain is sensitive to temperature, such that small differences can critically influence neuropathological outcomes (5). Hyperthermia has been demonstrated to worsen ischemic outcome and is associated with increased brain injury in animal models (5,6) and clinical studies (7-9). On the other hand, induced hypothermia to 32-34°C is recommended for comatose survivors of CA (10,11) and was recently shown to significantly mitigate brain injury in animal models (12)(13)(14) and clinical trials (15-18).
NIH Public AccessNeurological monitoring of comatose CA survivors is complicated by the requirement for sedative and paralytic agents, particularly in patients who are treated with hypothermia. Comatose CA survivors are typically cared for by nurses and physicians in general or cardiac intensive care units with little specialized training in neurological examination. In addition, the ability to detect even major changes in brain function in comatose patients is limited. Electroencephalograp...