2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of combined expansive agents and supplementary cementitious materials on the mechanical properties, shrinkage and chloride penetration of self-compacting concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Best strengths were achieved with 0.04% PVA and 0.02% PAA. This approach enhances self-curing and strength in high-strength concrete [30]. Exploring internal curing in concrete using wood powder and polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG-400).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best strengths were achieved with 0.04% PVA and 0.02% PAA. This approach enhances self-curing and strength in high-strength concrete [30]. Exploring internal curing in concrete using wood powder and polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG-400).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) as Portland cement replacement in concrete can have positive environmental effects and relatively lower concrete production costs [1,2]. Examples of SCMs include fly ash (FA), rice husk ash (RHA), silica fume (SF), and granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) [3][4][5][6][7]. By calcining kaolinite, a highly reactive pozzolanic substance known as metakaolin (MK) is produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the addition of fly ash as partial replacement in cement matrix with a ratio ranging from 15 to 60% can significantly reduce shrinkage due to the slower rate of hydration [ 34 , 35 ]. Additionally, it was shown that calcined clay can decrease short-term autogenous shrinkage but its addition to the composite matrix have a significant effect and thus increases the autogenous shrinkage over a long duration [ 36 , 37 , 38 ], whereas filler materials are often stated to reduce shrinkage by serving as small aggregate and thus decrease the shrinking of the cement paste [ 39 , 40 , 41 ]. It is because of these negative effects that it is vital to investigate the autogenous shrinkage behavior of composite concrete formations, particularly in limestone, slag filler mixtures, HPC, and in making environmentally friendly UHPC [ 37 , 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%