1984
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cognitive effort and word distinctiveness on learning disabled and nondisabled readers' recall.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the presentation of visual of information activates a process that determines what the child "verbally" knows about the stimulus object. However, as shown in picture-name study (Swanson, 1987a) and an anagram study (Swanson, 1984a), when lexical stores are meager, LD readers fail to effectively access a semantic system and thereby benefit from multiple inputs. The results also suggest that multiple-coding deficiencies are not characteristic of all LD readers.…”
Section: Multiple-stage Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Second, the presentation of visual of information activates a process that determines what the child "verbally" knows about the stimulus object. However, as shown in picture-name study (Swanson, 1987a) and an anagram study (Swanson, 1984a), when lexical stores are meager, LD readers fail to effectively access a semantic system and thereby benefit from multiple inputs. The results also suggest that multiple-coding deficiencies are not characteristic of all LD readers.…”
Section: Multiple-stage Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(c) Retention performance may be positively correlated with the amount of cognitive effort allocated to the criterion task. This assumption has received support in several studies (e.g., Ellis et al, 1984;Jacoby, 1978;McFarland, Frey, & Rhodes, 1980;O'Brien & Myers, 1985;Swanson, 1984;Tyler, Hertel, McCallum, & Ellis, 1979). At present, this assumption implies only a correlation between effort and memory and does not assume a causal relationship; moreover, the mechanisms underlying this relationship are yet to be understood.…”
Section: Resource Allocation Theory and Cognitive Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One other element that can account for processing effects on memory is cognitive effort. A number of researchers have reported that the allocation of capacity, or effort, in various tasks is related to better memory (e.g., Ellis, Thomas, & Rodriguez, 1984;Jacoby, 1978;O'Brien & Myers, 1985;Swanson, 1984;Tyler, Hertel, McCallum, & Ellis, 1979). In one such experiment, Tyler et al (1979) measured cognitive effort by the use of a secondary task paradigm with subjects who made decisions about words that could fit in sentences.…”
Section: Cognitive Effortmentioning
confidence: 99%