Effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for worry on persecutory delusions in patients with psychosis (WIT): a parallel, single-blind, randomised controlled trial with a mediation analysis

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundWorry might be a contributory causal factor in the occurrence of persecutory delusions in patients with psychotic disorders. Therefore we postulated that reducing worry with cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) would reduce persecutory delusions.MethodsFor our two-arm, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial (Worry Intervention Trial [WIT]), we recruited patients aged 18–65 years with persistent persecutory delusions but non-affective psychosis from two centres: the Oxford Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust (Oxford, UK) and the Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust (Southampton, UK). The key inclusion criteria for participants were a score of at least 3 on the Psychotic Symptoms Rating Scale (PSYRATS) denoting a current persecutory delusion; that the delusion had persisted for at least 3 months; a clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or delusional disorder; and a clinically significant level of worry. We randomly assigned (1:1) eligible patients, using a randomly permuted block procedure with variable block sizes and division by four strata, to either six sessions of worry-reduction CBT intervention done over 8 weeks added to standard care (the CBT-intervention group), or to standard care alone (the control group). The assessors were masked to patient allocations and did their assessments at week 0 (baseline), 8 weeks (end of treatment), and 24 weeks, follow-up. The primary outcomes were worry measured by the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) and delusions measured by the PSYRATS-delusion scale; we did the analyses in the intention-to-treat population, and also did a planned mediation analysis. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry (number ISRCTN23197625) and is closed to new participants.FindingsFrom Nov 1, 2011, to Sept 9, 2013, we recruited 150 eligible participants and randomly assigned 73 to the CBT intervention group, and 77 to the control group. 143 patients (95%) provided primary outcome follow-up data. Compared with standard care alone, at 8 weeks the CBT intervention significantly reduced worry (mean difference 6·35 [SE 1·56] PSWQ units, 95% CI 3·30–9·40; p<0·001) and persecutory delusions (2·08 [SE 0·73] PSYRATS units, 95% CI 0·64–3·51; p=0·005). The reductions were maintained to 24 weeks follow-up. The mediation analysis suggested that the change in worry accounted for 66% of the change in delusion. No patients died or were admitted to secure units during our study. Six suicide attempts (two in the CBT intervention group, and four in the control group) and two serious violent incidents (one in each group) were noted, but no adverse events were deemed related to the treatments or the assessments.InterpretationTo our knowledge, this is the first large trial focused on persecutory delusions. We have shown that long-standing delusions were significantly reduced by a brief intervention targeted on worry, although the limitations for our study include no determination of the key elements within the intervention. Our results sugg...

Conceptualising paranoia in ASD: A systematic review and development of a theoretical framework

“…In terms of treatment, CBT is reported to be effective for reducing paranoid features and secondary symptoms (e.g. Freeman et al, 2015), although no studies have sought to specifically target paranoia in individuals with ASD. We perceive that CBT interventions may well have clinical utility for concomitant paranoia in ASD, but that several adaptations may be needed, as is also the case when treating other psychiatric comorbidities (Lang et al, 2010;Spain et al, 2015).…”

“…In the typically-developing population, there is increasing evidence to suggest that timely assessment and psychological interventions (specifically cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT)) can reduce paranoia, associated distress, and secondary symptoms (e.g. Freeman et al, 2015). Whether this is also the case for the ASD population warrants consideration.…”

Establishing how psychological therapies work: the importance of mediation analysis

“…A recent innovation launched by the UK National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) has provided opportunities for funding specifically for Efficacy and Mechanisms Evaluation (EME) studies (Dunn et al, 2013;Walley & Thakker, 2008), with mediation studies being one aspect of the remit. This, and the growing interest in, and literature focused on mediation are positive steps that have and will continue to increase the use of robust methodological approaches for studying mediation and moderation in psychological research (Freeman et al, 2015). …”

Negative cognition, affect, metacognition and dimensions of paranoia in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: a multi-level modelling analysis

“…First, our findings suggest that cognitive behavioural assessments should include an examination of anxiety, depression, negative beliefs about self and others and metacognitive beliefs about paranoia. Given the associations we observed between negative emotions and paranoia, treatment of anxiety and depression within their own right (using strategies such as worry reduction and behavioural activation) may have beneficial effects on paranoid conviction; the first of these strategies has already been shown to be successful in patients with persecutory delusions (Foster et al 2010;Freeman et al 2015). Interventions aimed at improving self-esteem have been shown to be applicable to people with psychosis (Hall & Tarrier, 2003;Freeman et al 2014), and such approaches may well have an effect on affective dimensions of paranoia such as deservedness.…”