Effects of co-solutes on the hydrogen bonding structure and dynamics in aqueous N-methylacetamide solution: a molecular dynamics simulations study

Abstract

The effects of trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), urea and tetramethyl urea (TMU) on the hydrogen bonding structure and dynamics of aqueous solution of N-methylacetamide (NMA) are investigated by classical molecular dynamics simulations. The modification of the water's hydrogen bonding structure and interactions is calculated in presence of these co-solutes. It is observed that the number of four-hydrogen-bonded water molecules in the solution decreases significantly in the presence of TMAO rather than urea and TMU. The lifetime and structural relaxation time of water-water and NMA-water hydrogen bonds show a strong increase with the addition of TMAO and TMU in the solution, whereas the change is nominal in case of urea solution. It is also found that the translational and rotational dynamics of water and NMA slowdown with increasing the concentration of these osmolytes. The slower dynamics of water and NMA is more pronounced in case of TMAO and TMU solution, as these co-solutes strengthen the average hydrogen bond energies between water-water and NMA-water, whereas urea has a little effect on the hydrogen bonding structure and dynamics of aqueous NMA solution. The calculated self-diffusion coefficient values for water and these co-solutes are in similar pattern with experimental observations.

Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide on the Hydrogen Bonding Structure and Dynamics of Water and Its Influence on the Aqueous Solvation of the Insulin Monomer

“…The structural relaxation of hydrogen bonds is analyzed by using the intermittent hydrogen-bond correlation function C HB ( t ), and it is defined as − ,− C normalH normalB ( t ) = ⟨ h ( 0 ) h ( t ) ⟩ / < h ( 0 ) 2 …”

Evaluation of binding performance of bioactive compounds against main protease and mutant model spike receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2: Docking, ADMET properties and molecular dynamics simulation study

“…Now we studied the dynamical properties [ [45] , [46] , [47] ]. We conducted molecular dynamics simulation analysis using the GROMACS software [ 48 ] CHARMM General force field (CGenFF) was used to perform ligand parameterization [ 49 ].…”

Mechanism of Osmolyte Stabilization–Destabilization of Proteins: Experimental Evidence

“…As a result, stabilizing osmolytes are excluded from the vicinity of proteins. ,,− The surface of proteins is larger in the case of unfolded forms; thus, the equilibrium of the folding reaction is shifted toward the native state due to the entropy effect associated with the exclusion of the volume available for the osmolyte molecules. In turn, the driving force of protein unfolding by destabilizing osmolytes is the favorable enthalpy change, which results from a higher number of active binding centers accessible to denaturants in unfolded proteins. , Another hypothesis states that the stabilization or destabilization of proteins is the result of an indirect influence of osmolytes arising from the change in water properties in their solutions. ,,,− Some research teams indicate that the real mechanism can be a mix of both direct and indirect mechanisms. , …”