2012
DOI: 10.3354/cr01114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of climate change on killing frost in the Canadian prairies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some available water is still remaining in the soil profile after crop harvest, suggesting that the crops are unable to utilize all the water that is available during the growing period. Average frost-free days are 114.3 ± 1.6 days over the 126 years of recorded data at the experimental site (He et al, 2012). The short growing period may not give some crops sufficient time to utilize all the water resources available to maximize yield potential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some available water is still remaining in the soil profile after crop harvest, suggesting that the crops are unable to utilize all the water that is available during the growing period. Average frost-free days are 114.3 ± 1.6 days over the 126 years of recorded data at the experimental site (He et al, 2012). The short growing period may not give some crops sufficient time to utilize all the water resources available to maximize yield potential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A portion of this water is above the 'permanent wilting point' of water content for the particular soil 34 , suggesting that a portion of remaining water should be available for crops to be grown the following spring. The frost-free period averages 114.3 days over the 126 years of recorded data at the experimental site 25 , with the air temperature reaching below zero in the first and second week of September, and the soil starts freezing soon thereafter. Thus, the rather short growing season, which is typical of the northern latitude region of the North American Great Plains, might not allow some crops to have adequate time to utilize all of the water that is available during the growth period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many areas of Mediterranean countries, the use of pulses to enhance soil N has been practiced for decades, and the advantages have been widely demonstrated 23 24 . However, it is not known whether diversifying summerfallow systems with pulses is effective and productive in the northern latitude areas where water is scarce and the growing season is short (95 to 125 days) 25 . Our proposal for diversifying summerfallow systems with short-season pulses is largely based on the latest research on pulses: ( a) pulse plants in the northern latitudes have a shallow rooting depth 26 with approximately 77–85% of the roots being located in the 0–0.4 m soil depth 27 , which allows pulse crops to use water mainly from the top 0.6 m soil layer, leaving water in the deeper soil layers (below 0.6 cm) 28 for use by deeper-rooted crops that are grown the following year 29 ; ( b ) dry pea and lentil, the two main annual pulses grown in the semiarid northern Great Plains, use 15–35% less water than cereal or oilseed crops, thereby enhancing water use efficiency 30 ; ( c ) pulses are typically harvested several weeks earlier than cereal or oilseed crops, leaving a longer postharvest period during which soil water can accumulate prior to planting crops the following spring 31 ; ( d ) the inclusion of pulse crops in the rotation can increase crop yields, decrease inputs of inorganic N fertilizer 32 , and enhance N use efficiency 33 ; and finally ( e ) long-term studies have shown that crop diversification with pulses and oilseed can improve overall farming sustainability 6 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%