2015
DOI: 10.3354/meps11306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of climate and eutrophication on the diversity of hard bottom communities on the Skagerrak coast 1990-2010

Abstract: Changes in water quality and transparency (Mankovsky et al. 1996, Sanden & Håkansson 1996, Aksnes & Ohman 2009, Aksnes et al. 2009) and large-scale ecosystem shifts (e.g. Steneck et al. 2004) in the coastal zone are occurring globally. Eutrophication is also one of the most serious and challenging environmental problems in the N orth Sea (OSPAR 2010) and Skagerrak (Boesch et al. 2006, Diaz & Rosenberg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential for this decline is considered more likely for species with slow postdisturbance recovery rates [e.g., corals (38)], those species that display little seasonal variability in abundance [e.g., mangroves (39)], or those species experiencing stressors of sufficiently widespread and high magnitude [e.g., fishes (1)]. However, for many taxa, globally coherent signals of change are unlikely when the identity and magnitude of drivers vary widely on local and regional scales (4,17,40), where species and ecotypes within taxonomic groups respond variably to change, or where abiotic and biotic contexts vary widely across geographic locations (41). The global average decline detected by our analysis was modest compared with the large interregional variability in the trajectories of change exhibited by kelps across their range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential for this decline is considered more likely for species with slow postdisturbance recovery rates [e.g., corals (38)], those species that display little seasonal variability in abundance [e.g., mangroves (39)], or those species experiencing stressors of sufficiently widespread and high magnitude [e.g., fishes (1)]. However, for many taxa, globally coherent signals of change are unlikely when the identity and magnitude of drivers vary widely on local and regional scales (4,17,40), where species and ecotypes within taxonomic groups respond variably to change, or where abiotic and biotic contexts vary widely across geographic locations (41). The global average decline detected by our analysis was modest compared with the large interregional variability in the trajectories of change exhibited by kelps across their range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gametogenesis in L. digitata gametophytes was readily induced between 5°C and 15°C, with very high to maximum sporophyte recruitment under simulated conditions of long photoperiods and enriched nutrient conditions, a situation that is probably only present along the Norwegian coastline in summer (Wassmann and Aadnesen 1984) or when coastal eutrophication is encountered (Norderhaug et al 2015). The optimum temperature range for gametogenesis of L. digitata reported here is similar to previous studies with Helgoland material that reported high fertility between 5°C and 12°C, and slightly reduced fertility at 17°C (tom Table 3 Müller et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, the impacts of major anthropogenic pressures on coastal and benthic marine biodiversity have been studied intensely. Here, especially field assessments investigated the negative effects arising from bottom trawling (Jennings and Kaiser 1998;Kaiser et al 2006;Tillin et al 2006;Worm et al 2006;Olsgard et al 2008), coastal nutrient loading (Rosenberg and Nilsson 2005;Quijon et al 2008), and climate change (Norderhaug et al 2015). However, since many of these drivers act on the ecosystems simultaneously and over long periods of time Halpern et al 2008), it is difficult to infer cumulative impacts from such assessments (Moksnes et al 2008;Robinson and Frid 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%