2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of clay's chemical interactions on biocementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheng and Shahin [25] used clayey sand with up to 20% clay content and assessed three MICP treatment methods including injection, premixing, and diffusion. Cardoso et al [26] carried out oedometer and Brazilian splitting tests to characterize the biocementation effect on clayey sand and highlighted the importance of chemical effects originated from the clay fraction on soil behavior. Li et al [27] blended fly ash at different concentrations into the MICP-treated expansive soil and showed that biocement and fly ash contributed jointly to the soil improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheng and Shahin [25] used clayey sand with up to 20% clay content and assessed three MICP treatment methods including injection, premixing, and diffusion. Cardoso et al [26] carried out oedometer and Brazilian splitting tests to characterize the biocementation effect on clayey sand and highlighted the importance of chemical effects originated from the clay fraction on soil behavior. Li et al [27] blended fly ash at different concentrations into the MICP-treated expansive soil and showed that biocement and fly ash contributed jointly to the soil improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strain P6 (Corynebacterium urealyticum), belonging to the first group of calcifying strains ( Figure 5), was selected for deep sand biocementation base on its capability to precipitate CaCO3 crystals in liquid B4 medium, to hydrolyze urea and to grow in anaerobiosis (Tables 3 and 5 After the biotreatment, the sand samples did not reach a cementation level sufficient to be subjected to the shear strength test, even in the presence of urea, calcium chloride and low clay fraction [38,39].…”
Section: P1 P2 P3 P4 M5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various ecological implications of BCP in biotechnology have been described by Zhu and Dittrich [37]. BCP applications include: bioremediation of metal contaminated soil and ground water; restoration and preservation of calcareous sculptural artefacts, historical monuments and civil buildings; bioconcrete; different geotechnical-engineering applications such as soil/sand strength, sand impermeability, mitigation of liquefaction, soil erosion control, impermeabilization of polluted soils and other soil improvement projects; Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR); CO2 sequestration; filler for rubber, plastic and ink [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Neupane [50] and Cardoso et al [11], coarse-grained soils are good candidates for an effective MICP technique; however, this study was conducted with the aim of understanding the efficacy of MICP technique in low plasticity soils in order to establish the relationship between plasticity characteristics and MICP with different compositional variables (i.e., S. pasteurii suspension density and S. pasteurii suspension-cementation reagent mix ratio). The optimal requirements for different organisms are different in terms of bacterial densities, water requirements and other compositional variables for effective MICP output [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%