2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2005.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of circumferential pick spacing on boom type roadheader cutting head performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the general cutting head used with a roadheader [27][28][29], three waterjet-assisted cutting heads were developed using different waterjet/pick combinations (as shown in Figure 2): in cutting head I, the waterjet nozzle is integrated with the conical pick, as shown in Figure 2(a), and the direction of the waterjet velocity is parallel to the axis of the conical pick; in cutting head II, the nozzle is separate from the conical pick and ahead of the conical pick, as shown in Figure 2(b), and there is a distance between the waterjet impact point and the tip of the conical pick; and in cutting head III, the waterjet/pick combination is similar to cutting head II, but the distance between the waterjet impact point and the tip of the conical pick is almost equal to zero, as shown in Figure 2(c).…”
Section: Different Types Of Waterjet/pickmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the general cutting head used with a roadheader [27][28][29], three waterjet-assisted cutting heads were developed using different waterjet/pick combinations (as shown in Figure 2): in cutting head I, the waterjet nozzle is integrated with the conical pick, as shown in Figure 2(a), and the direction of the waterjet velocity is parallel to the axis of the conical pick; in cutting head II, the nozzle is separate from the conical pick and ahead of the conical pick, as shown in Figure 2(b), and there is a distance between the waterjet impact point and the tip of the conical pick; and in cutting head III, the waterjet/pick combination is similar to cutting head II, but the distance between the waterjet impact point and the tip of the conical pick is almost equal to zero, as shown in Figure 2(c).…”
Section: Different Types Of Waterjet/pickmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ experiments with this instrumented bit were conducted in three mines to obtain the coal cutting forces. Eyyuboglu and Bolukbasi [12] investigated the effects of equal and unequal circumferential pick spacing on the performance of road-headers by conducting in-situ experiments in Park Cayirhan Coal Mine in Turkey. Through in-situ experiment is the most reliable method to obtain the cutting forces, it is costly and difficult, and there is no appropriate opportunity to conduct in-situ experiments in mines for most researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li Xiaohuo analyzed the movement of a longitudinal cutting head in a road header and found the path of a cutting line in space had an important impact on the performance of a road header (Li, 1998). Effects of equal and unequal circumferential pick spacing on a road header machine were researched by E. Mustafa Eyyuboglu, et al Through a series of experiments, they drew the conclusion that there were no remarkable differences between the two types of cutting heads (Eyyuboglu and Bolukbasi, 2005). H. Ergin et al investigated the detail effect of design parameters (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%