Effects of Choice Architecture and Chef-Enhanced Meals on the Selection and Consumption of Healthier School Foods

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Little is known about the long-term effect of a chef-enhanced menu on healthier food selection and consumption in school lunchrooms. In addition, it remains unclear if extended exposure to other strategies to promote healthier foods (eg, choice architecture) also improves food selection or consumption. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the short- and long-term effects of chef-enhanced meals and extended exposure to choice architecture on healthier school food selection and consumption. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A school-based randomized clinical trial was conducted during the 2011–2012 school year among 14 elementary and middle schools in 2 urban, low-income school districts (intent-to-treat analysis). Included in the study were 2638 students in grades 3 through 8 attending participating schools (38.4%of eligible participants). INTERVENTIONS Schools were first randomized to receive a professional chef to improve school meal palatability (chef schools) or to a delayed intervention (control group). To assess the effect of choice architecture (smart café), all schools after 3 months were then randomized to the smart café intervention or to the control group. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES School food selection was recorded, and consumption was measured using plate waste methods. RESULTS After 3 months, vegetable selection increased in chef vs control schools (odds ratio [OR], 1.75; 95% CI, 1.36–2.24), but there was no effect on the selection of other components or on meal consumption. After long-term or extended exposure to the chef or smart café intervention, fruit selection increased in the chef (OR, 3.08; 95% CI, 2.23–4.25), smart café (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13–1.87), and chef plus smart café (OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.26–4.25) schools compared with the control schools, and consumption increased in the chef schools (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03–0.30 cups/d). Vegetable selection increased in the chef (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.83–3.54), smart café (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.46–2.50), and chef plus smart café schools (OR, 7.38, 95% CI, 5.26–10.35) compared with the control schools, and consumption also increased in the chef (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.09–0.22 cups/d) and chef plus smart café (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05–0.19 cups/d) schools; however, the smart café intervention alone had no effect on consumption. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Schools should consider both collaborating with chefs and using choice architecture to increase fruit and vegetable selection. Efforts to improve the taste of school foods through chef-enhanced meals should remain a priority because this was the only method that also increased consumption. This was observed only after students were repeatedly exposed to the new foods for 7 months. Therefore, schools should not abandon healthier options if they are initially met with resistance. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02309840

“Reforms Looked Really Good on Paper”: Rural Food Service Responses to the Healthy, Hunger‐Free Kids Act of 2010

“…Anecdotal and scholarly evidence suggest that interventions to support food service changes have had success. 17,18 The results of this study suggest that interventions targeting knowledge, perceived and actual support, and communication may be useful.…”

Increasing fruit and vegetable intake among male university students in an ad libitum buffet setting: A choice architectural nudge intervention

“…Serving sequence has previously been significantly associated with food purchases, also in complex study designs (Cohen et al, 2015). Moreover, vegetables sales could be increased by about 11% through simply repositioning meal components in a buffet setting (Wansink & Just, 2011).…”

Amount of Time to Eat Lunch Is Associated with Children’s Selection and Consumption of School Meal Entrée, Fruits, Vegetables, and Milk

“…Chan School of Public Health to improve the selection and consumption of healthier school foods using a chef-based model and/or choice architecture (environmental modifications to “nudge” consumers towards healthier options). 17 The present study focuses on the six control schools with set lunch period times (e.g. schools without rolling lunch periods), and were elementary, middle, and K-8 schools located in a low-income, urban school district in Massachusetts.…”

“…Previous analyses indicate that there were no significant differences in food selection or consumption between students who actively consented and those who did not. 5,17 Approximately 85% of the students in the participating schools were eligible for free or reduced-priced meals.…”