2004
DOI: 10.2175/106143004x141915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Chlorination on the Adhesion Strength and Deflocculation of Activated Sludge Flocs

Abstract: A side effect of the application of chlorine for controlling filamentous bulking is deflocculation of floc‐forming bacteria, which may cause unacceptable effluent deterioration depending on dosing. It was assumed that chlorine may adversely affect the adhesion ability of floc bacteria, promoting their erosion in shear flow. The effect of chlorination on the strength of activated sludge flocs was investigated. The adhesion–erosion (AE) model developed by Mikkelsen and Keiding was used to interpret results from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…digestion. An adhesion model was used to determine the effect on floc strength of chlorinating activated sludge for control of filamentous bacteria (Mascarenhas et al, 2004). One of the two activated sludge flocs studied showed no impact on floc strength from chlorination while the other floc showed a decrease in floc strength which led to deflocculation.…”
Section: Design Operation and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…digestion. An adhesion model was used to determine the effect on floc strength of chlorinating activated sludge for control of filamentous bacteria (Mascarenhas et al, 2004). One of the two activated sludge flocs studied showed no impact on floc strength from chlorination while the other floc showed a decrease in floc strength which led to deflocculation.…”
Section: Design Operation and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, chlorination oen causes side effects on wastewater treatment performance by deocculating activated sludge resulting in poor effluent water quality. 19,20 There is also a concern about the development of chlorine-resistant lamentous bacteria in sludge. 3,21 Other types of toxicants such as cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), ozone and hydrogen peroxide are generally too costly to use, and they generate harmful disinfection byproducts (DPBs), odor and chemical scum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%