2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of chemical and enzymatic modifications on starch-linoleic acid complex formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The soluble complex had a similar DS as the insoluble complex within the same treatment for both starches (Table ). The β‐amylase treatment resulted in starch with a significantly greater DS for both complexes because of the inability of β‐amylase to hydrolyze anhydroglucose units that were acetylated, agreeing with the findings of Arijaje et al and Arijaje and Wang …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The soluble complex had a similar DS as the insoluble complex within the same treatment for both starches (Table ). The β‐amylase treatment resulted in starch with a significantly greater DS for both complexes because of the inability of β‐amylase to hydrolyze anhydroglucose units that were acetylated, agreeing with the findings of Arijaje et al and Arijaje and Wang …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although their amylose contents were distinctly different, the similar distribution of acetyl groups was attributed to the rapid reaction of acetylation and the location of the acetyl groups nearby the amylopectin branching points . Under the conditions studied, soluble complexes were formed at a DS of 0.034 and 0.032 for potato starch and Hylon VII, respectively, which were lower than the DS reported for the formation of soluble complexes between acetylated potato starch and stearic (DS 0.063), oleic and linoleic acids (DS 0.048) . More planar molecules tend to be included in a greater proportion into the amylose helix, causing the complex to precipitate, hence a greater DS was required to maintain the soluble complex as demonstrated by Wulff and Kubik and Wulff et al which showed that hydroxypropylated amylose of DS 0.06–0.075 was needed to maintain soluble complexes with sodium dodecyl sulfate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations