Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period*

Hamzaoui, Olfa; Monnet, Xavier; Richard, Christian; Osman, David; Chemla, Denis; Teboul, Jean‐Louis

doi:10.1097/01.ccm.ob013e318161fec4

Cited by 156 publications

(99 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As a minimal consensus, a re-calibration of PCCI should be performed within eight hours after the previous TPTD. However, there is limited evidence that 'time since last TPTD' is an independent predictor of the inaccuracy of PCCI [56]. There are several hints that changes in vascular tone measured by TPTD-derived SVRI are associated with inaccuracy of PCCI [56].…”

Section: When To Perform Tptdmentioning

confidence: 99%

Common pitfalls and tips and tricks to get the most out of your transpulmonary thermodilution device: results of a survey and state-of-the-art review

Hofkens¹,

Verrijcken²,

Merveille³

et al. 2015

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Haemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) is less invasive than a pulmonary artery catheter, and is increasingly used in the Intensive Care Unit and the Operating Room. Optimal treatment of the critically ill patient demands adequate, precise and continuous monitoring of clinical parameters. Little is known about staff knowledge of the basic principles and practical implementation of TPTD measurements at the bedside. The aims of this review are to: 1) present the results of a survey on the knowledge of TPTD measurement among 252 nurses and doctors; and 2) to focus on specific situations and common pitfalls in order to improve patient management in daily practice. Methods: Web-based survey on knowledge of PiCCO technology (Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany), followed by PubMed and Medline search with review of the relevant literature regarding the use of TPTD in specific situations. Results: In total, 252 persons participated in the survey: 196 nurses (78%) and 56 medical doctors (22%) of whom 17 were residents in training. Knowledge on the use of TPTD appears to be suboptimal, with an average score of 58.3%. Doctors performed better than nurses (62.7% vs 57.0%, P = 0.012). About 190 out of 252 (75.4%) scored at least 50% but only 45 respondents (17.9%) obtained a score of 70% or more. Having five years of PiCCO experience was present in 15.8% of the participants and this was correlated to passing the test, defined as obtaining a test result of ≥ 50% (P = 0.07) or obtaining a test result of ≥ 70% (P = 0.05). There were no other parameters significantly predictive for obtaining a result above 50% or above 70% such as gender or doctor versus nurse or Belgian versus Dutch residency, or years of ICU experience. High quality education of nursing and medical staff is necessary to perform the technique correctly and to analyse and interpret the information that can be obtained. Visual inspection of thermodilution curves is important as this can point towards specific pathology. Interpretation of the parameters that can be obtained with TPTD in specific conditions is discussed. Finally, a practical approach is given in ten easy steps for nurses and doctors. Conclusion: TPTD has gained its place in the haemodynamic monitoring field, but, as with any technique, its virtue is only fully appreciated with correct use and interpretation.

show abstract

Section: When To Perform Tptdmentioning

confidence: 99%

Common pitfalls and tips and tricks to get the most out of your transpulmonary thermodilution device: results of a survey and state-of-the-art review

Hofkens¹,

Verrijcken²,

Merveille³

et al. 2015

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Th e calibration process is also used for the adjustment of individual aortic impedance and needs to be repeated every eight hours in hemo dynamically stable patients. However, during situations of hemodynamic instability, calibration needs to be done more frequently (eventually every hour) [9]. Nevertheless, a variety of studies have successfully validated the PiCCOplus TM system in diff erent patient populations [10,11].…”

Section: Pulse Pressure Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Cardiac Output Monitoring: An Integrative Perspective

Alhashemi¹,

Cecconi²,

Hofer³

2011

Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Moreover, changes in vasomotor tone can impair the measurement performance of pulse contour analysis that might however be improved by frequent calibration to CO assessed with a more invasive technology (e.g. transpulmonary thermodilution) [16][17][18][19]. In addition, the proprietary pulse contour analysis algorithms consider biometric patient data or properties of the arterial pressure waveform to derive CO; in certain patients or clinical situations these mathematical assumptions might not hold true [19].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%