“…Subjects above the means test, and therefore generally subject to higher or more frequent medication copayments, were approximately 30% less likely to be dispensed these preventive medications. The influence of copayments upon medication prescribing patterns has been well documented and is consistent with our observations [51,52]. The means test status of subjects also predicts early GIO prophylaxis, with subjects above the means test again less likely to be dispensed these therapies (OR, 0.71).…”
Rates of prescriptions to prevent osteoporosis in a cohort of older men with rheumatoid arthritis on chronic glucocorticoids were low. Gastrointestinal disorders and drugs and disorders potentially linked to osteoporosis are associated with diminished odds of being prescribed GIO-preventing medications.
“…Subjects above the means test, and therefore generally subject to higher or more frequent medication copayments, were approximately 30% less likely to be dispensed these preventive medications. The influence of copayments upon medication prescribing patterns has been well documented and is consistent with our observations [51,52]. The means test status of subjects also predicts early GIO prophylaxis, with subjects above the means test again less likely to be dispensed these therapies (OR, 0.71).…”
Rates of prescriptions to prevent osteoporosis in a cohort of older men with rheumatoid arthritis on chronic glucocorticoids were low. Gastrointestinal disorders and drugs and disorders potentially linked to osteoporosis are associated with diminished odds of being prescribed GIO-preventing medications.
“…However, the use of antidepressants among women decreased after the increased co-payment in 1997 [11]. Some studies that investigated increased cost-sharing reported a reduction in the pace of increase of pharmaceutical expenditures [5,6,8,15] whereas other report no effects on total drug cost [12,16,17]. These studies were performed in different countries where co-payment systems for patients differ which make it difficult to compare the results as the direction and magnitude of effects will depend on the generosity of the system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the patient's share of the cost is commonly used to cut the increase in pharmaceutical expenditure [1,[5][6][7][8][9]. It can be done in several ways such as introducing or increasing co-payment and through restriction of volumes subsidised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, increasing the patient's share should reduce demand by shifting the cost burden to the patient [1,10]. Several studies have investigated effects of increased co-payments [5,6,8,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16]. Some report associations between increased co-payment for pharmaceuticals and decreased utilization [13] and costs as well as reduced rate of increase of costs and reduced cost per prescription [5,6,8,15].…”
“…According to other studies, cosharing mechanisms can be effective as a cost-containment measure because these increase efficiency by controlling excess demand [9]. The advantage of the proportional system is that the costs are directly related to the duration of treatment and that individuals become price sensitive.…”
The economic results of the measures for third-party payers were positive. The measures, however, should be reconsidered and examined more closely considering social effects, such as accessibility, especially for vulnerable groups in need of essential pharmaceutical care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.